Do republicans think we're gineapigs? Born completely formed with no developmental years?
this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
748 points (95.3% liked)
Microblog Memes
7483 readers
1271 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It's funny, but it's not really a rebuttal, since the claim is that it doesn't exclude any cis women. A better rebuttal would be antinatalist women who are also born with defective ovaries. (I'm sure there'd be at least one person like that.)
at least one person
I recently learned that 1 in 5000 women are born entirely without a uterus.
From a biological perspective, this question has been answered already as it's really not that hard.
Many people apparently just don't like the answer.
load more comments
(36 replies)
The concept is worthless because its hard to define