this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
1049 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

68991 readers
4445 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Into everything

FTFY

[–] idriss@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I was taking the CCNA course then tests in 2013. I remember how they were pushing their IoT prediction in the courses so hard.

IoT ended up cringe af. To control your vacuum cleaner, it needs to connect to a remote API server hosted in AWS then back to you sitting next to the vacuum cleaner. I could say at the time nobody wants that shit. Now I hate it even more and I skip all the smart products.

I have a similar feeling about LLMs now. They are nice, they solve some problems nicely, they are far from perfect, I dont want them shoved everywhere.

I don't know what they were teaching you at the course, but home/personal IoT was never the most interesting thing in the field. IoT sees a lot more interest and use in industrial application, for example stuff like logistics, farming, automation, measuring, stuff like traffic signals and smart grids, and so on

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fedditor385@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I actually wouldn't mind AI in everything, if there was a simple one switch so I could easily turn it off if I don't want to use it. The problem is only in forcing it into peoples faces.

I guess they poured to much money into AI for it to fail, and now they must force people to use it to in order to justify the investments.

If it was a good product, people would ask for more themselves.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Is this some kind of windows joke I'm too GPL to understand?

[–] Razzazzika@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just got the instructions I'm to learn about how to put AI into my programs at work. So thrilled.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 13 points 1 week ago

During a meeting not too long ago someone was like "we're looking into using AI to generate these reports."

So they have a dude who gets requests to generate reports. It's not the same reports, but rather custom reports from scattered bits of data throughout a huge database. Ergo you can't really create a program to extract these reports on demand, a person actually has to sit and piece these together.

Now they want to use LLMs to alleviate him, as this isn't technically his role.

They scoffed at me when I asked about how important it is that these reports are accurate, but I mean, it's a valid concern. Best case you get sometimes-hallucinated reports, worst case you get something that wreaks havoc on the database because it just spits out garbage SQL.

I'm very glad that my role doesn't involve that BS.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Big tech‘s response: „Have you tried using wood glue to add texture?“

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›