this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
101 points (87.4% liked)

Selfhosted

46196 readers
327 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am making this post in good faith

In my last post I asked about securely hosting Jellyfin given my specific setup. A lot of people misunderstood my situation, which caused the whole thread to turn into a mess, and I didn't get the help I needed.

I am very new to selfhosting, which means I don't know everything. Instead of telling me that I don't know something, please help me learn and understand. I am here asking for help, even if I am not very good at it, which I apologize for.

With that said, let me reoutline my situation:

I use my ISP's default router, and the router is owned by Amazon. I am not the one managing the router, so I have no control over it. That alone means I have significant reason not to trust my own home network, and it means I employ the use of ProtonVPN to hide my traffic from my ISP and I require the use of encryption even over the LAN for privacy reasons. That is my threat model, so please respect that, even if you don't agree with it. If you don't agree with it, and don't have any help to give, please bring your knowledge elsewhere, as your assistance is not required here. Thank you for being respectful!

Due to financial reasons, I can only use the free tier of ProtonVPN, and I want to avoid costs where I can. That means I can only host on the hardware I have, which is a Raspberry Pi 5, and I want to avoid the cost of buying a domain or using a third party provider.

I want to access Jellyfin from multiple devices, such as my phone, laptop, and computer, which means I'm not going to host Jellyfin on-device. I have to host it on a server, which is, in this case, the Raspberry Pi.

With that, I already have a plan for protecting the server itself, which I outlined in the other post, by installing securecore on it. Securing the server is a different project, and not what I am asking for help for here.

I want help encrypting the Jellyfin traffic in transit. Since I always have ProtonVPN enabled, and Android devices only have one VPN slot enabled, I cannot use something such as Tailscale for encryption. There is some hope in doing some manual ProtonVPN configurations, but I don't know how that would work, so someone may be able to help with that.

All Jellyfin clients I have used (on Linux and Android) do not accept self-signed certificates. You can test this yourself by configuring Jellyfin to only accept HTTPS requests, using a self-signed certificate (without a domain), and trying to access Jellyfin from a client. This is a known limitation. I wouldn't want to use self-signed certificates anyways, since an unknown intruder on the network could perform a MITM attack to decrypt traffic (or the router itself, however unlikely).

Even if I don't trust my network, I can still verify the security and authenticity of the software I use in many, many ways. This is not the topic of this post, but I am mentioning it just in case.

Finally, I want to mention that ProtonVPN in its free tier does not allow LAN connections. The only other VPN providers I would consider are Mullvad VPN or IVPN, both of which are paid. I don't intend to get rid of ProtonVPN, and again that is not the topic of this post.

Please keep things on-topic, and be respectful. Again, I am here to learn, which is why I am asking for help. I don't know everything, so please keep that in mind. What are my options for encrypting Jellyfin traffic in transit, while prioritizing privacy and security?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tychosmoose@lemm.ee 38 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How about creating your own LAN within the untrusted network?

Something like an inexpensive OpenWRT router would do fine. Connect all your devices and the server to the router. They are now on a trusted network. Set up Wireguard on the OpenWRT router to connect to Proton so that your outbound traffic from all your devices is secured.

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was looking for this. Op seems to be obsessed with "zero trust", so creating a trusted area for this stuff would be an easy win.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Exactly! I did that for a couple years until I found a cheap modem to replace the ISP modem. It didn't do any routing, so there was no weird NAT issue, it just converted the DSL signal to Ethernet with a WAN IP.

I didn't have to change any network settings on my LAN when I switched, or when I moved to another place with a different ISP. I had that same router for years, even after I got a dedicated AP for my house.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 7 points 1 week ago

I work for an ISP, and this is a common practice among my peers

[–] TDCN@feddit.dk 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have done this before as well when living in a dorm where wifi was shit so i did my own little setup in my room so I could stream to Crome cast etc on my own trusted lan. Get a small router with support for wire Guard vpn (i love mikrotik for this) and you have an easy way to tunnel out for all your devices.

[–] Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Hey, this is off topic from the original post but could you tell me what device specifically you have used?

I am going to be moving into a dorm soon and was looking to set up my own VLAN or ehatever you need for a private network because I don't want to mess with the dorm router. I had a look at a Mikrotik switch (CRS310) but was unsure whether the fan noise would be too loud if I am staying in the same room and more importantly, whether this even allows me to do what I want to do

Edit: I misused the word dorm. It is a shared appartment rented with a couple of other students.

[–] tychosmoose@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That isn't what I would choose for your situation. CRS3xx switches are fast at switching (layer 1 & 2), but not as a NAT router, which you probably need.

Better to pick something from the Mikrotik Ethernet Routers range, assuming you don't want your personal LAN to have WiFi. The L009 or basic RB5009 are both good options in the same price range. Choosing depends on your upstream connection speed. Both are fanless.

Or pick a Home/Office Wireless device if you are permitted to have your own WiFi access point. The hAP ax2 is small, affordable and performs well at 1Gbps. If your upstream connection is 1Gpbs this is probably what I would choose even if you don't want WiFi as long as this is enough ports. Just turn off its WiFi radios to use it wired-only. If you have a 2.5Gbps upstream port then hAP ax3 is a better choice.

All the Mikrotik choices will require some learning if you want anything beyond a basic router configuration. But once you get it like you want it they are very solid and reliable.

OpenWRT and OPNSense are easier to jump into without a lot of effort, so if you don't want a networking hobby I would use one of them. Pick up pre installed device if you want it easy. Or get a mini PC with a few network ports and install the OS yourself to get more power for the money.

[–] Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wow, that was a lot more comprehensive than what I was hoping for. Thanks.

I was particularly interested in the CRS310 because it had 2.5G ports with the ability to eventually later even expand into 10G. 10G speeds aren't really relevant for me (for now) since I mainly want the speed advantage for slightly faster transfers to my NAS but I would be interested in 2.5G capability. Do you think it makes sense to pick one of the devices you recommended, specifically the hAP ax2 and then if I want to get into 2.5G territory to buy an unmanaged 2.5G switch? Speeds of 2.5G and more are only interesting for transfers between my own local devices for me. I don't need the rest of the network to have fast access so I guess the hAP ax2 makes more sense to buy than ax3. The ability to open my own WiFi network is also quite attractive so I can have local access even from my laptop or phone which I guess is another point in favor of the Home/Office AP route.

[–] tychosmoose@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure. That plan would work. You might want to be sure that this is permitted at your university.

Universities often have strict rules about what should connect to their networks.

[–] Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah I may have misused the word dorm. It's more of a shared appartment rented by multiple students so there aren't any limitations in that regard fortunately.

[–] tychosmoose@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Ah, got it. That plan should be great. You can segment your own wired+WiFi network with that hardware, and even do Wireguard from the hAP ax2 to get whole-network egress via an outside VPN service at a good data rate, if you want.

The other devices you might consider as the router are the GL-iNet Slate series. They will be slower as a VPN router, but they're pretty small and light. They come with a skinned OpenWRT, but in most cases you can install a build of the unmodified OS if you want.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A lot of people have suggested Tailscale and it's basically the perfect solution to all your requirements.

You keep saying you need ProtonVPN which means you can't use Tailscale, but Tailscale actually supports setting up an exit node which is what you need. Put Protonvpn on the Raspberry Pi, then set it up as an exit node for your tailnet. There's a lot of people talking about how they did this online. It looks like they even have native support for bypassing the manual setup if you use Mullvad.

As long as every client has the ability to use Tailscale (I.e. no weird TVs or anything) this seems like it checks all your boxes. And since everything is E2EE from Tailscale, TLS is redundant and you can just use HTTP.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'll just add my 2¢

Tailscale is incredibly powerful and they do a lot of work to make their systems intelligible, but the learning curve is still pretty steep. But still a great option.

[–] treyf711@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

One thing that I do, though it may not be as secure as a reverse proxy is just using tailscale funnel to expose my jellyfin instance.

I’d like to learn a self-hosted SSO but time is my least abundant resource at the moment.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Hi again.

How about the following idea:

Set up ProtonVPN on the raspberry pi.

On all other devices (or at least those you want to use Jellyfin on), switch from using Proton to using Wireguard. Unlike your phone, the raspberry pi has no trouble running multiple VPNs. I think the ProtonVPN limitations in regard to not allowing split tunneling don't apply here, since all outgoing traffic will still go via Proton.

Essentially, the Pi would function as a proxy for all of your traffic, "and also" host Jellyfin. You would still connect to http://192.168.20.10:8096/ (or whatever) on your devices, but that address would only resolve to anything when you are connected to the pi via Wireguard. No HTTPs, but "HTTP over Wireguard", if you will.

Nots that this requires you trusting the pi to the same degree that you trust your phone.

For your static devices (PC, TV) this should solve the problem. Devices which you take with you, like your phone, unfortunately will loose internet connectivity when you leave your home until you switch off Wireguard, and switch on Proton, and not be able to connect to Jellyfin when you return home, until you switch them back.

Essentially, you would have a "home" VPN and a "on the go" VPN, though you never need to connect to both. There might be ways to automate this based on WiFi SSID on Android, but I have not looked into it.

The Pros:

  • this should meet all your requirements. No additional expenses, no domain, no dynDNS; no selfsigned certificate or custom CA; traffic is never unencrypted; works on all common devices.
  • Wireguard is sufficiently lightweight to not bog down the pi, normally
  • this is actually well within the intended use-cases for Wireguard, so no "black magic" required in configuring it
  • if you ever do decide to get a domain, you can configure everything to always be connected to your pi via Wireguard, even on the go! Not required though.

The Cons:

  • when you are new to selfhosting, Wireguard is a bit daunting to set up. It is not the easiest to debug (don't worry, it's easy to tell IF it is working, but not always WHY it isn't working). Some manual route handling is probably also required on the pi. It should definitely be doable though, but might turn this Jellyfin thing from a weekend project to a 2 week project...
  • I have no experience with how well the pi runs Jellyfin. If the answer is "barely", then adding multiple concurrent Wireguard sessions might be a bad experience. Though in this case, you could only switch Proton to Wireguard whenever you want to watch Jellyfin.
  • the manual switching might be annoying, but that is the price to pay here, so to speak

Edit: someone else already mentioned setting up your own trusted network with a second router. IMO that is the better, more hassle-free option IF you are willing to shell out the money. My suggestion is the "free" version of that, essentially 😄

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

ProtonVPN in its free tier does not allow LAN connections

This is the limiting factor. In order to get around this, you'll have to put your Jellyfin server on the Internet. Hopefully you can enable port forwarding. If not, you have painted yourself into a corner.

If you cannot use self-signed or internal CA certs, you will also need a domain name, and something like Let's Encrypt to issue certs for that domain.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

you’ll have to put your Jellyfin server on the Internet.

Don't.

https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/5415

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, you shouldn't, but OP seems determined to hamstring themselves and do everything as convoluted as possible.

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Yeah, this whole thread feels like a "but I can't do that, work around it for me"

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Do. And make sure your logs are piped through fail2ban.

All of these "vulnerabilities", require already having knowledge of the ItemIDs, and anyone without it poking around will get banned.

The rest of them require a user be authenticated, but allows horizontal information gathering. These are not RCEs or anything serious. The ones which allowed cross-user information editing have been fixed.

[–] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Don't. OP already said in the previous post that they only need Jellyfin access within their home. The Principle of Least Privilege tilts in favor of keeping Jellyfin off the public Internet. Even if Jellyfin were flawless -- and no program is -- the only benefit that accrues to OP is that the free tier of ProtonVPN can access Jellyfin.

Opening a large attack surface for such a modest benefit is letting the tail wag the dog. It's adding a kludge to workaround a different kludge, the latter being ProtonVPN's very weird paid tier.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I read the old thread and now this one.

As I understand it, you want to create connection between clients on your lan, but you don't trust your lan, so it's like having a raspberry pi server and some client both on the coffee shop network and you want them to communicate securely?

Tailscale is what you want. Easy setup, free, and allows exactly this to happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

I previously proffered some information in the first thread.

But there's something I wish to clarify about self-signed certificates, for the benefit of everyone. Irrespective of whichever certificate store that an app uses -- either its own or the one maintained by the OS -- the CA Browser Forum, which maintains the standards for public certificates, prohibits issuance of TLS certificates for reserved IPv4 or IPv6 addresses. See Section 4.2.2.

This is because those addresses will resolve to different machines on different networks. Whereas a certificate for a global-scope IP address is fine because it should resolve to the same destination. If certificate authorities won't issue certs for private IP addresses, there's a good chance that apps won't tolerate such certs either. Nor should they, for precisely the reason given above.

A proper self-signed cert -- either for a domain name or a global-scope IP address -- does not create any MITM issues as long as the certificate was manually confirmed the first time and added to the trust store, either in-app or in the OS. Thereafter, only a bona fide MITM attack would raise an alarm, the same as if a MITM attacker tries to impersonate any other domain name. SSH is the most similar, where trust-on-first-connection is the norm, not the outlier.

There are safe ways to use self-signed certificate. People should not discard that option so wontonly.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Arkhive@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

To be totally honest I didn’t read your entire post, but just from your intro I think we are in similar situations. ISP router, low costs, using only the hardware you have around. I’ve solved a lot of stuff with Tailscale. None of my services are public facing and instead I connect to them over Tailscale (could be replaced with wireguard).

The wall I’m hitting you or maybe others could help with, is accessing my services from sub domains of a single Tailscale address rather than having to type port numbers for everything. I know this involves a reverse proxy and DNS (I use PiHole for that), but I’m stuck trying to configure the two in a way that actually works. Once I finally ditch iOS for good I’ll probably just sync a hosts file between all my devices using Syncthing to help streamline the DNS situation.

[–] Charger8232@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Once I finally ditch iOS for good

I had that feeling for all too long. It's so refreshing to break free. Word of advice: make sure to switch over your Signal account to make your new phone as an owner

You planning on GrapheneOS?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vl95g@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 week ago

And I'm in a similar place as you though I've managed to get a bit further. I'm using docker and caddy sidecar with tailscale. I've started with nextcloud aio that had all neatly explained here and I've built on top of that. I've added other services like immich, jellyfin. I'm also testing local reverse proxy with the same domain (*.ts.net) as through the tailscale (to get their certificates), so that I can access them locally without tailscale. I want to use it mostly locally and only occasionally remotely. You might also learn something from this tutorial

[–] DesolateMood@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One thing that I haven't seen anyone mention yet, in this post or the last one, how to you plan on aquiring videos for your server? If you plan on torrenting, you just have to pay for a vpn, Proton doesn't allow you to make p2p connections like that on a free account

[–] Charger8232@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've been able to use Proton for torrenting, although at abysmal speeds. I don't acquire many new videos, so this isn't an issue quite yet. When I have more money I will absolutely be switching to Mullvad VPN.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Don't use Mullvad for torrenting. They're a great VPN but they had to remove port forwarding so you'll be unable to torrent properly. AirVPN is an alternative that still has port forwarding available.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Willdrick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Here's an idea: on your android device use something like Insular to create a work profile, that way you get its own VPN slot, add your selfhosted-related apps there along with Tailscale. You can keep ProtonVPN on for your other apps, while using TS for your "LAN away from home" stuff. Since Tailscale already encrypts all traffic, you don't have to worry about HTTPS, certs, et al.

[–] Charger8232@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

THIS

While I would make the modification to use Android's Private Space instead of a work profile (or Shelter instead of Insular), this was such an obvious solution, and I feel stupid for not seeing it. I might use Wireguard instead of Tailscale, I don't know yet, but thank you! Consider yourself an outside the box thinker!

We all got hung up on trying to fix Proton, when Android was the issue here!

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 week ago

Wow, there isn’t a single solution in here with the obvious answer?

You’ll need a domain name. It doesn’t need to be paid - you can use DuckDNS. Note that whoever hosts your DNS needs to support dynamic DNS. I use Cloudflare for this for free (not their other services) even though I bought my domains from Namecheap.

Then, you can either set up Let’s Encrypt on device and have it generate certs in a location Jellyfin knows about (not sure what this entails exactly, as I don’t use this approach) or you can do what I do:

  1. Set up a reverse proxy - I use Traefik but there are a few other solid options - and configure it to use Let’s Encrypt and your domain name.
  2. Your reverse proxy should have ports 443 and 80 exposed, but should upgrade http requests to https.
  3. Add Jellyfin as a service and route in your reverse proxy’s config.

On your router, forward port 443 to the outbound secure port from your PI (which for simplicity’s sake should also be port 443). You likely also need to forward port 80 in order to verify Let’s Encrypt.

If you want to use Jellyfin while on your network and your router doesn’t support NAT loopback requests, then you can use the server’s IP address and expose Jellyfin’s HTTP ports (e.g., 8080) - just make sure to not forward those ports from the router. You’ll have local unencrypted transfers if you do this, though.

Make sure you have secure passwords in Jellyfin. Note that you are vulnerable to a Jellyfin or Traefik vulnerability if one is found, so make sure to keep your software updated.

If you use Docker, I can share some config info with you on how to set this all up with Traefik, Jellyfin, and a dynamic dns services all up with docker-compose services.

[–] lefixxx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

and Android devices only have one VPN slot enabled, I cannot use something such as Tailscale for encryption.

I solved a similar situation with a tailscale subnet router . a tailscale subnet router is a tailscale node that exposes the non-tailscale network to the tailscale network. This way I am able to access one of my routers (and its PBX) from all tailscale nodes. The android phone has only tailscale as a VPN. If i pay for mulvad I can have the rest of the traffic go over a mullvad node.

doesn't really help you here though, unless you install protonVPN on the pi and add that as a tailscale exit node.

[–] marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

OP, I have been facing the same situation as you in this community recently. This was not the case when I first joined Lemmy but the behaviour around these parts has started to resemble Reddit more and more. But we'll leave it at that.

I think I have a solution for you if you're willing to spend $2-$3 a month - set up a VPS and run a Wireguard server on it. Run clients on your devices and the raspberry pi and connect to it.

As for your LAN: from the discussion you linked, it seems that Jellyfin will use the CAs present in the OS trust store. That's not very hard to do on Linux but I guess if you have to do it on Android you'd have some more trouble. In either case, using a reverse-proxy (I like HAProxy but I use it at work and it might be more enterprise than you need, for beginners Caddy is usually easier) will fix the trouble you're having with your own CA and self-signed certs.

I am interested in the attack vector you mentioned; could you elaborate on the MITM attack?

Unfortunately, if you don't have control over your network, you cannot force a DNS server for your devices unless you can set it yourself for every individual client. If I assume that you can do that, then:

  1. Set up DNS server on Pi
  2. Set up CA on Pi
  3. Create root CRT, CSR and server certs from it (bare-minimim setup)
  4. Copy over this stuff to Jellyfin image/VM, and copy root cert to clients trust store.
  5. Run reverse proxy in front of Jellyfin and configure the correct IP address of the reverse proxy with an A record in your DNS server.
  6. Configure reverse-proxy with server/application cert.
  7. Use RethinkDNS on Android to pass everything through the wireguard server hosted on the VPS, and set private DNS to the DNS server hosted on the Pi.

I think that should do it. This turned out more complicated than I imagined (it's more of a brain dump at this point), feel free to ask if it is overwhelming.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Charger8232@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Since I always have ProtonVPN enabled, and Android devices only have one VPN slot enabled, I cannot use something such as Tailscale for encryption.

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Tailscale is only for the server/host. You're not changing all of your VPN services over to this, you're using it in a 'reverse' fashion. You're VPN-ing the server out to the world so it's reachable and you have port forwarding options, etc.

From there, it can be reached by any client on the internet as a service. From there though, I don't know how you'd get to it securely without a domain and SSL (Let's Encrypt/Caddy) certs.

A domain is only like $16/year. So it's not prohibitively expensive.

[–] swab148@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Domains can be even cheaper than that, I got a .net address from porkbun for $12.50 a year. That's cheap enough for even me, and I am broke, y'all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] colonelp4nic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I remember you were worried about your ISP messing things up for you, hence the VPN. I would recommend creating a "Virtual Machine" that does all of your downloading to whatever hard drive you're using. That VM can have proton installed. Then, on your regular computer (not within the VM), you can host Jellyfin with no VPN involved, making it accessible at 192.168.0.xx.

I think this hits your goals without needing to expose Jellyfin to the Internet. Plus it has minimal technical complexity. Your downloading traffic will be VPN protected, but Jellyfin will still be accessible to your local network.
edit: You can set up a password for Jellyfin, protecting it from your internal threats.

edit2: You can use letsencrypt to create a certificate that picky clients will accept. Buy a domain, any domain, and configure the "A record" to point to 192.168.0.xx (your Jellyfin IP). Then tell your client to go to whatever domain you get, like "luigiliterallydidnothingwrongplzfree.com", then the client will have to use the internet to ask DNS what the IP address is, but after that, it will just use your local network.

edit3: Since you just have the raspberry PI, instead of using a Virtual Machine, you could have 2 separate SD cards. One only has the downloader and VPN installed, the other only has Jellyfin installed (no VPN). Then swap as needed.

load more comments
view more: next ›