this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
99 points (97.1% liked)

World News

32315 readers
784 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] daftantimony@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

"We do not tolerate companies that use forced labor, that abuse the human rights of individuals in order to make a profit," Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas said in the statement.

Oh cool, that must mean they'll also put an end to for-profit prisons!

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON, Sept 26 (Reuters) - The United States restricted imports from three more Chinese companies on Tuesday as part of an effort to eliminate goods made with the forced labor of Uyghur minorities from the U.S. supply chain.

"We do not tolerate companies that use forced labor, that abuse the human rights of individuals in order to make a profit," Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas said in the statement.

The three companies were designated for working with the government of Xinjiang to recruit and transport, harbor or use the forced labor of Uyghurs, Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, or members of other persecuted groups out of the region, the United States said.

U.S. officials believe Chinese authorities have established labor camps for Uyghurs and other Muslim minority groups in China's western Xinjiang region.

The State Department later on Tuesday updated its business advisory on the Xingjiang supply chain to call attention to China's "ongoing genocide and crimes against humanity in Xinjiang and the evidence of widespread use of forced labor there."

It stressed the urgency for businesses to take due diligence measures, including identifying, assessing and acting on forced labor and human rights risks for workers.


The original article contains 454 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 57%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] zephyreks@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is this the same genocide that's not recognized by any Muslim country?

[–] cnnrduncan@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Money > standing up for random people who are being mistreated in a country far away from you.

[–] zephyreks@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, because that usually leads to unanimous decisions in countries that are literally founded on the basis of preserving Islam.

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 1 year ago

Yes, because the saints that run those countries are totally Muslim 😉🙄