this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1650 points (96.6% liked)

Science Memes

13391 readers
1908 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EnthusiasticNature94@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I agree with Dr. Jey McCreight on the science.

But for determining truth, both sides are wrong here.

Dunning-Kruger is bad, but so is credentialism and appeal to authority.

Many people with PhD's have had Dunning-Kruger. Someone else mentioned Ben Carson being great at neurosurgery, but not politics.

A PhD doesn't make you infallible.

I am saying this as someone who is taking graduate-level courses and will be pursuing my PhD. When I'm correct, it's not because my future PhD causes reality to magically conform to my opinions - it's because I rigorously looked at the evidence, logic, and formed my own conclusion that better aligns with reality.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You can even be incorrect on a subject you have expertise in.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

that's why we have peer reviews for new findings by experts.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RumorsOfLove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Critically thinking now, how strong is the evidence here?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 2 days ago (6 children)

To be fair, a Person with a PhD still can have Dunning-Kruger on other subjects.

Ben Carson is a great Neurosurgeon, but dumbass on politics.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 166 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Confidently incorrect is the default with these people. I spend most of my time with family aggressively correcting misinformation about my field and related ones. They will die earlier thinking they know more because of Youtube. Getting them to stop taking bad health advice and mystery joint injections from a fucking chiropractor is the latest battle.

[–] vaguerant@fedia.io 98 points 3 days ago (11 children)

The impression of legitimacy enjoyed by chiropractic is too damn high. I was well into my 20s before I ever heard a single word about it being pseudoscience. Walking around (usually on people's fucking spines) calling themselves doctors, I absolutely believed it was just some sub-variety of physiotherapy, which I guess is the point. In the whole universe of alternative medicine, I think that has to be the practice which has most effectively disguised itself as conventional medicine. It's gross.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 128 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (16 children)

Note how they always enshrine gender in biology, but then make all kinds of non-biological statements about what gender is.

"XX is woman"/"Large gametes is woman"/"can conceive is woman"

And then they'll say

"Women aren't as aggressive", "women are more emotional", "women like being in the home more", "those are women's clothes", etc.

The only reason it's so important for it to be biological is because of how it punishes gender non-conformity and makes the lives of trans people hell. Like it isn't ideologically consistent and they know that. They just don't care. If it was just about genitals or chromosomes, then why is it that gender dictates all these social things about us? The only reason to root gender in how you were born is to ensure gender roles are as rigid and immutable as possible.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The phrase is funny but you wouldn't catch me dead wearing a logical fallacy

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can I interest you in a logical phallus?

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 4 points 1 day ago

Wouldn't that be a logic probe?

[–] Blazingtransfem98@discuss.online 58 points 2 days ago (16 children)

I think a lot of these XX XY "only two genders" people aren't just dunning Kruger, they're transphobic idiots with an agenda. So even if they had the science and knowledge it wouldn't matter because they're pushing their hateful stupid agenda, facts and logic be damned. They don't care, they just want to rationalize hating us trans people because we make them uncomfy.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Yeah but science can be proven wrong an change over time, while my beliefs and biases are forever!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

One time a woman told me that my lack of a second X Chromosome meant I would "always be a man"

So I gaslit her into thinking her husband had klinefelters.

I hate how Republicans think transphobia is science

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›