this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
85 points (91.3% liked)

Privacy

1171 readers
568 users here now

Protect your privacy in the digital world

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be nice, civil and no bigotry/prejudice.
  2. No tankies/alt-right fascists. The former can be tolerated but the latter are banned.
  3. Stay on topic.
  4. Don't promote proprietary software.
  5. No crypto, blockchain, etc.
  6. No Xitter links. (only allowed when can't fact check any other way, use xcancel)
  7. If in doubt, read rule 1

Related communities:

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/26233189

"Android System SafetyCore’ claims to be a ‘security’ application, but whilst running in the background, it collects call logs, contacts, location, your microphone, and much more making this application ‘spyware’ and a HUGE privacy concern. It is strongly advised to uninstall this program if you can. To do this, navigate to 'Settings’ > 'Apps’, then delete the application."

If you don't want to navigate android settings you can also simply uninstall it from the Play Store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.safetycore

Additionaly you can install this placeholder app to prevent Google from reinstalling it every time it updates: https://github.com/daboynb/SafetyCore-placeholder

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bam13302@ttrpg.network 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Top comment on the lemmy world this was cross posted with points out among other things that the app isn't a system app and doesn't otherwise have permissions to access most of what is claimed here, and from a cursory glance at the app on my phone that claim looks correct. is there something I'm missing or is this post just wrong?

Comment in question: https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/16670102

[–] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're not missing anything. This is FUD.

[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can you explain what you mean to a less technologically inclined person?

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

FUD = Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt: the paranoia over the topic is needless and you don't have to take any action.

I disagree with this view and did replace SafetyCore with the dummy placeholder .APK, personally.

[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Oh ok, thank you for the explanation. I also replaced it just to be safe

[–] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As discussed in other threads it's a non system APK which holds no dangerous permissions and can't gain them. It will (once enabled and if you let it) scan inbound and outbound messages for nudity. It's there to prevent people from receiving unsolicited nudes without consent, or if they're sending nudes make sure they aren't falling into some pedo groomer blackmail.

I understand the initial response, but now that the info is available I question the motives of people still spreading it.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago

Well, then I trust my own ability to not fall prey to such blackmail and would rather omit the scanning for battery life's sake. So yes, I'm nitpicky (if that's the conclusion).

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 day ago

It's not open source so it's up to trusting Google for that to be true.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You're not missing something, a lot of this is FUD, Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt. Same as the Intel ME conspiracy theories which largely lose all their bite when given even the least bit of scrutiny. It's one of those things to make people afraid for attention and clicks but ultimately contains a lot of vague points, and possibly even misinformation. If you feel worried just install the placeholder, but a lot of what's shared in the article about bypassing permissions when it's not even a system app is FUD and ultimately misinformation, since as pointed out it isn't a system app and has no permissions declared.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago

Yea, even the article pretty much says it’s okay

Cool. Probably won't cause issues on my GrapheneOS device, but I'll check.