this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
1022 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

63375 readers
4110 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The latest Edge Canary version started disabling Manifest V2-based extensions with the following message: "This extension is no longer supported. Microsoft Edge recommends that you remove it." Although the browser turns off old extensions without asking, you can still make them work by clicking "Manage extension" and toggling it back (you will have to acknowledge another prompt).

At this point, it is not entirely clear what is going on. Google started phasing out Manifest V2 extensions in June 2024, and it has a clear roadmap for the process. Microsoft's documentation, however, still says "TBD," so the exact dates are not known yet. This leads to some speculating about the situation being one of "unexpected changes" coming from Chromium. Either way, sooner or later, Microsoft will ditch MV2-based extensions, so get ready as we wait for Microsoft to shine some light on its plans.

Another thing worth noting is that the change does not appear to be affecting Edge's stable release or Beta/Dev Channels. For now, only Canary versions disable uBlock Origin and other MV2 extensions, leaving users a way to toggle them back on. Also, the uBlock Origin is still available in the Edge Add-ons store

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Perfect time to check out AdGuard Home. Trivial to install locally. Probably took less than 3 minutes to install and get it operating. Hardest part was updating my router config. (Goddamn Google WiFi!)

Then you can focus on getting a better browser. Support libre software and check out LibreWolf.

[–] ridethisbike@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Librewolf on desktop Mull on Android

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I don't suggest Librewolf for the plebians though.

It comes with very aggressive anti-fingerprinting and privacy features.

For people in !technology@lemmy.world that's less of a problem but I wouldn't suggest it to my family members.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 29 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Mull is not maintained anymore. However there is a fork called IronFox.

[–] ridethisbike@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well shit... Thanks for the heads up!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Regular Android Firefox has Ublock origins as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just in case you needed another reason not to use Edge.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

Chrome* or Chromium based browsers*

[–] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 66 points 1 day ago (27 children)
[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 89 points 1 day ago (6 children)

90% of people and corporations are either using Edge or Chrome and since there's essentially no difference between the two they are equally bad. We're back to a browser mono-culture, just like in the bad old days of Internet Explorer.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 35 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It's not that bad yet. FF works on pretty much any site that's not demonstrating some sort of bleeding edge fuckery. I haven't seen a "best viewed in Chrome" for a decade or two.

Hopefully this sort of enshittification will drive more people to use other browsers.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People actually use that thing?

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 20 hours ago

Edge is actually pretty decent. Native vertical tabs, M365 SSO integration, native multiple profiles with quick switching, preinstalled on your work computer and will work with anything that "only works in chrome"

Obviously this is ignoring the obvious downsides such as assisting Microsoft's search, browser and platform monopolies, tracking data sent to Microsoft, etc. etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Fancy firefox-based browser along the lines of Arc?

https://zen-browser.app/

Worth a look if you're a web power-user / developer sort of person

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Zen's glance feature allows you to view links without actually opening them.

I do not like the wording of this because you are opening it

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DuskyRo@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Ok maybe off topic, why does a web browser have to be one of the most complicated software artifacts on earth? So expensive to write and maintain that only a few orgs with huge developer resources can do it?

What would it look like to start from scratch with a massively simplified standard for specifying UIs, based on all we've learned since html/css was invented? A standard that a few developers could implement in a few weeks using off the shelf libraries. Rather than reimplement every bizarre historical detail in html/css, have a new UI layout system that's simple and consistent, and perhaps more powerful.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Basically browsers are big because they are operating systems for web hosted applications with huge attack surfaces and lots of legacy compatibility requirements amassed over 3 decades.

A rewrite isn't the answer. Putting limits on browser functionality is. JavaScript was the turning point IMHO.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›