this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
632 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

66892 readers
5041 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 150 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (10 children)

"To enable the massive 256GB/s memory bandwidth that Ryzen AI Max delivers, the LPDDR5x is soldered," writes Framework CEO Nirav Patel in a post about today's announcements. "We spent months working with AMD to explore ways around this but ultimately determined that it wasn’t technically feasible to land modular memory at high throughput with the 256-bit memory bus. Because the memory is non-upgradeable, we’re being deliberate in making memory pricing more reasonable than you might find with other brands."

😒🍎

Edit: to be clear, I was only trying to point out that "we’re being deliberate in making memory pricing more reasonable than you might find with other brands" is clearly targeting the Mac Mini, because Apple likes to price-gouge on RAM upgrades. ("Unamused face looking at Apple," get it? Maybe I emoji'd wrong.) My comment is not meant to be an opinion about the soldered RAM.

[–] simple@lemm.ee 62 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (15 children)

To be fair it starts with 32GB of RAM, which should be enough for most people. I know it's a bit ironic that Framework have a non-upgradeable part, but I can't see myself buying a 128GB machine and hoping to raise it any time in the future.

If you really need an upgradeable machine you wouldn't be buying a mini-PC anyways, seems like they're trying to capture a different market entirely.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Yeah hugely disappointed by this tbh. They should have made a gaming capable steam machine in cooperation with valve instead :)

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah.

But that's AMD's fault, as they gimped the GPU so much on the lower end. There should be a "cheap" 8-core, 1-CCD part with close to the full 40 CUs... But there is not.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 133 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

Framework releasing a Mac Mini was certainly not on my bingo card for this year.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 84 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Lmao the news about this desktop is strangling their website to the point of needing a 45 minute waiting list

[–] SatyrSack@feddit.org 46 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They did announce three major products today.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah that touchscreen tablet convertible machine is what has me psyched. I'm not the target for it, and already own a 16, but I could see that thing selling well. I honestly think they came out with the desktop because they just kinda felt they needed a desktop.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 72 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Not really sure who this is for. With soldered RAM is less upgradeable than a regular PC.

AI nerds maybe? Sure got a lot of RAM in there potentially attached to a GPU.

But how capable is that really when compared to a 5090 or similar?

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 46 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

The 5090 is basically useless for AI dev/testing because it only has 32GB. Mind as well get an array of 3090s.

The AI Max is slower and finicky, but it will run things you'd normally need an A100 the price of a car to run.

But that aside, there are tons of workstations apps gated by nothing but VRAM capacity that this will blow open.

[–] KingRandomGuy@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Useless is a strong term. I do a fair amount of research on a single 4090. Lots of problems can fit in <32 GB of VRAM. Even my 3060 is good enough to run small scale tests locally.

I'm in CV, and even with enterprise grade hardware, most folks I know are limited to 48GB (A40 and L40S, substantially cheaper and more accessible than A100/H100/H200). My advisor would always say that you should really try to set up a problem where you can iterate in a few days worth of time on a single GPU, and lots of problems are still approachable that way. Of course you're not going to make the next SOTA VLM on a 5090, but not every problem is that big.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 50 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (23 children)

Holy moly this is awesome! I am in for the 128GB SKU.

That's 96GB of usable VRAM! And way more CPU bandwidth than any desktop Zen chip.

I know people are going to complain about non upgradable memory, but you can just replace the board, and in this case it’s so worth it for the speed/power efficiency. This isn’t artificial crippling, it physically has to be soldered, at least until LPCAMM catches on.

My only ask would be a full X16 (or at least a physical X16/electrical x8) PCIe slot or breakout ribbon. X4 would be a bit of a bottleneck for some GPUs/workloads… Does Strix Halo even support that?

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 29 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I understand the memory constraints but it does feel weird for framework, is all I have to say. But that's also the general trajectory of computing from what it seems. I really want lpcamm to catch on!

[–] Scholars_Mate@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Apparently Framework did try to get AMD to use LPCAMM, but it just didn't work from a signal integrity standpoint at the kind of speeds they need to run the memory at.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Sounds like it doesn't bode well for the future of DIMMs at all, TBH.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago

You have a DIMM view of the future.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Eventually most system RAM will have to be packaged anyway. Physics dictates that one pays a penalty going over pins and mobo traces, and it gets more severe with every advancement.

It's possible that external RAM will eventually evolve into a "2nd tier" of system memory, for background processes, spillover, inactive programs/data, things like that.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's already fourth tier after L1, L2, L3 caches.

Maybe something like optane will make a comeback. Having 16gb of soldered RAM and 500gb of relatively slow, but inexpensive optane RAM would be great.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 49 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

Soldered on ram and GPU. Strange for Framework.

[–] enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works 48 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

Apparently AMD couldn’t make the signal integrity work out with socketed RAM. (source: LTT video with Framework CEO)

IMHO: Up until now, using soldered RAM was lazy and cheap bullshit. But I do think we are at the limit of what’s reasonable to do over socketed RAM. In high performance datacenter applications, socketed RAM is on it’s way out (see: MI300A, Grace-{Hopper,Blackwell},Xeon Max), with onboard memory gaining ground. I think we’ll see the same trend on consumer stuff as well. Requirements on memory bandwidth and latency are going up with recent trends like powerful integrated graphics and AI-slop, and socketed RAM simply won’t work.

It’s sad, but in a few generations I think only the lower end consumer CPUs will be possible to use with socketed RAM. I’m betting the high performance consumer CPUs will require not only soldered, but on-board RAM.

Finally, some Grace Hopper to make everyone happy: https://youtube.com/watch?v=gYqF6-h9Cvg

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I definitely wouldn't mind soldered RAM if there's still an expansion socket. Solder in at least a reasonable minimum (16G?) and not the cheap stuff but memory that can actually use the signal integrity advantage, I may want more RAM but it's fine if it's a bit slower. You can leave out the DIMM slot but then have at least one PCIe x16 expansion slot. A free one, one in addition to the GPU slot. PCIe latency isn't stellar but on the upside, expansion boards would come with their own memory controllers, and push come to shove you can configure the faster RAM as cache / the expansion RAM as swap.

Heck, throw the memory into the CPU package. It's not like there's ever a situation where you don't need RAM.

[–] enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

All your RAM needs to be the same speed unless you want to open up a rabbit hole. All attempts at that thus far have kinda flopped. You can make very good use of such systems, but I’ve only seen it succeed with software specifically tailored for that use case (say databases or simulations).

The way I see it, RAM in the future will be on package and non-expandable. CXL might get some traction, but naah.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Calling it a gaming PC feels misleading. It's definitely geared more towards enterprise/AI workloads. If you want upgradeable just buy a regular framework. This desktop is interesting but niche and doesn't seem like it's for gamers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ganoo_slash_linux@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I feel like this is a big miss by framework. Maybe I just don't understand because I already own a Velka 3 that i used happily for years and building small form factor with standard parts seems better than what this is offering. Better as in better performance, aesthetics, space optimization, upgradeability - SFF is not a cheap or easy way to build a computer.

The biggest constraint building in the sub-5 liter format is GPU compatibility because not many manufacturers even make boards in the <180mm length category. Also can't go much higher than 150-200 watts because cooling is so difficult. There are still options though, i rocked a PNY 1660 super for a long time, and the current most powerful option is a 4060ti. Although upgrades are limited to what manufacturers occasionally produce, it is upgradeable, and it is truly desktop performance.

On the CPU side, you can physically put in whatever CPU you want. The only limitation is that the cooler, alpenfohn black ridge or noctua l9a/l9i, probably won't have a good time cooling 100+ watts without aggressive undervolting and power limits. 65 watts TDP still gives you a ryzen 7 9700x.

Motherboards have the SFF tax but are high quality in general. Flex ATX PSUs were a bit harder to find 5 or 6 years ago but now the black 600W enhance ENP is readily available from Velkase's website. Drives and memory are completely standard. m.2 fits with the motherboard, 2.5in SATA also fits in one of the corners. Normal low profile DDR5 is replaceable / upgradeable.

What framework is releasing is more like a laptop board in a ~4 liter case and I really don't like that in order to upgrade any part of CPU, GPU or memory you have to replace the entire board because it's soldered on APU and not socketed or discrete components. Framework's enclosure hasn't been designed to hold a motherboard+discrete GPU and the board doesn't have a PCIe slot if you wanted to attach a card via riser in another case. It could be worse but I don't see this as a good use of development resources.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Question about how shared VRAM works

So I need to specify in the BIOS the split, and then it's dedicated at runtime, or can I allocate VRAM dynamically as needed by workload?

On macos you don't really have to think about this, so wondering how this compares.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] excral@feddit.org 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't get the point. Framework laptops are interesting because they are modular but for desktop PCs that's the default. And Framework's PCs are less modular than a standard PC because the RAM is soldered

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 4shtonButcher@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Now, can we have a cool European company doing similar stuff? At the rate it's going I can't decide whether I shouldn't buy American because I don't want to support a fascist country or because I'm afraid the country might crumble so badly that I can't count on getting service for my device.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] UnsavoryMollusk@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

At first I was skeptical during the announcement and then I saw the amount of ram and the rack. Imho it is not for enduser but for business. In fact we have workloads that would be perfectly fit that computer so why not?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

This is one stupid product. It really goes against everything the framework brand has identified with.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 35 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (10 children)

I'd argue not. It's as modular/repairable as the platform can be (with them outright stating the problematic soldered RAM), and not exorbitantly priced for what it is.

But what I think is most "Framework" is shooting for a niche big OEMs have completely flubbed or enshittified. There's a market (like me) that wants precisely this, not like a framework-branded gaming tower or whatever else a desktop would look like.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Desktops are already that, though. In order for them to distinguish themselves in the industry, they can't just offer another modular desktop PC. They can't offer prebuilts, or gaming towers, or small form factor units, or pre-specced you-build kits. They can't even offer low-cost micro-desktops. All of those markets are saturated.

But they can offer a cheap Mac Studio alternative. Nobody's cracked that nut yet. And it remains to be seen if this will be it, but it certainly seems like it's lined up to.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

This is not really that interesting and kinda weird given the non-upgradability, but I guess it's good for AI workloads. It's just not that unique compared to their laptops.

I'd love a mid-tower case with swappable front panel I/O and modular bays for optical drives; would've been the perfect product for Framework to make IMO.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 0x0@programming.dev 15 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

The Framework Desktop is powered by an AMD Ryzen AI Max processor, a Radeon 8060S integrated GPU, and between 32GB and 128GB of soldered-in RAM.

The CPU and GPU are one piece of silicon, and they're soldered to the motherboard. The RAM is also soldered down and not upgradeable once you've bought it, setting it apart from nearly every other board Framework sells.

It'd raise an eyebrow if it was a laptop but it's a freakin' desktop. Fuck you framework.

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

insanely hostile response to something like this. they attempted to have these parts replaceable, AMD physically couldn't do it. they've still made it as repairable as possible, and will without a doubt be more repairable than similar devices using this chipset. fucking relax, being reactionary without being informed is dumb.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I get the frustration with a system being so locked down, but if 32gb is the minimum I don’t really see the problem. This pc will be outdated before you really need to upgrade the ram to play new games.

[–] muelltonne@feddit.org 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

It's not just about upgrading. It's also about being able to repair your computer. RAM likes to go bad and on a normal PC, you can replace it easily. Buy a cheap stick, take out the old RAM, put in the new one and you'll have a working computer again. Quick & easy and even your grandpa is able to run Memtest and do a quick switch. But if you solder down everything, the whole PC becomes electronic waste as most people won't be able to solder RAM.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Much like their laptops, I'm all for the idea, but what makes this desirable by those of us with no interest in AI?

I'm out of that loop though I get that AI is typically graphics processing heavy, can this be taken advantage of with other things like video rendering?

I just don't know exactly what an AI CPU such as the Ryzen AI Max offers over a non-AI equivalent processor.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

There is a massive push right now for energy efficient alternatives to nvidia GPUs for AI/ML. PLENTY of companies are dumping massive amounts of money on macs and rapidly learning the lesson the rest of us learned decades ago in terms of power and performance.

The reality is that this is going to be marketed for AI because it has an APU which, keeping it simple, is a CPU+GPU. And plenty of companies are going to rush to buy them for that and a very limited subset will have a good experience because they don't have time sensitive operations.

But yeah, this is very much geared for light-moderate gaming, video rendering, and HTPCs. That is what APUs are actually good for. They make amazing workstations. I could also see this potentially being very useful for a small business/household local LLM for stuff like code generation and the like but... those small scale models don't need anywhere near these resources.

As for framework being involved: Someone has kindly explained to me that even though you have to replace the entire mobo to increase the amount of memory, you can still customize your side panels at any moment so I guess that is fitting the mission statement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 weeks ago

what makes this desirable by those of us with no interest in AI?

Juat maybe not all products need to be for everyone.
Sometimes it's fine if a product fits your label of "Not for me".

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

There's lots of workstation niches that are gated by VRAM size, like very complex rendering, scientific workloads, image/video processing... It's not mega fast, but basically this can do things at a reasonable speed that you'd normally need a $20K+ computer to even try. Like, if something takes hours on an A6000 Ada or an A100, just waiting overnight on one of these is not a big deal. Cashing or failing to launch on a 4090 or 7900 XTX is.

That aside, the IGP is massively faster than any other integrated graphics you'll find. It's reasonably power efficient.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›