Enough Musk Spam

2505 readers

706 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

jordanpeterson@lemmy.world

an0nym0us@lemmy.dbzer0.com

1629

Why 150 years olds are still getting social security benefits (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 day ago by DytallixB@lemmy.world to c/enoughmuskspam@lemmy.world

190 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 3) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

tbf it's only embarrassing if you're capable of embarrassment.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 day ago

But but it's BREAKING! With a red light emoji!

[–] anindefinitearticle@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 day ago

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/2/14/2303889/-Nope-There-are-no-150-year-olds-on-Social-Security-It-s-COBOL

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (21 children)

They also found that there's people over 200, so that default date thing doesn't really explain it all.

load more comments (21 replies)

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 day ago

As someone who is working on a project of recreating an enterprise application in a modern tech stack, the legacy code is hard to understand too.

We have something similar in that a ClaimClosedDate is defaulted to 01/01/1900 and if it has that date it means it’s not closed whereas now that would be a nullable field.

[–] LittleLordFauntleroy@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

Eejit...

[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Jay Kuo is wirth worth following. I know people dislike substack, but a lot decent people publish there. Jay Kuo is good at breaking down the legal aspects of the mess we are seeing now

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll wait until it get reposted on a platform that isn't doing revenue sharing with Nazis. You know, like myLemmy instance.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments