this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
1480 points (97.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

6423 readers
3528 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I Oppose Deathcamps, Extermination, and Invasion (aka: the nazi f' Elon and the Felon's policies)

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Or you could ask them if they know what DEI stands for.

Spoiler Alert: They don't.

They love hating acronyms and nicknames repeated by their media sources that they know literally nothing about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 8 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

TBH, as a poor white kid from coal country, DEI based scholarships were quite unfair to me. Busting my ass to survive while these kids who were already better off than me from the start got a free ride. Nonsense.

I don't have a great answer, but the extreme implementations of these programs and now the extreme removal of them are both wrong.

[–] Glent@lemmy.ca 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Care to describe the extreme implementation?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

I think this is an area that is perilous.

So certain DEI initiatives are flawed in unfair ways. So there's room for valid criticism.

However, more critically it's a gigantic dog whistle. The magnitude of the flaws does not call for massive emails demanding everyone snitch at any whiff of DEI and sweeping offices to remove anything deemed DEI aligned and cancelling any hint of celebrating cultural diversity.

So on the one hand I can relate to a discussion of flaws, but in the broader context it seems more to serve the agenda of those blowing the dog whistle.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This anecdote ignores what the broader statistics prove, though. There will always be outliers. But in general, there are groups that are not white kids that are more likely to be disenfranchised and excluded at large scale.

[–] Draces@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Their point seems to be exactly that the bigger point ignores the anecdotes and we shouldn't do that either?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml 3 points 15 hours ago (10 children)

As far as I understand, DEI as a policy in a university or workplace means giving place to a candidate because not of their merits or test scores, but because of their race or background.

Isn't that racism?

Be gentle, am not USian.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 2 points 14 hours ago

US (and many other nations) corporate and education systems have long given preferential treatment/selection to white employees and students, to the point where the more qualified candidate was passed by due to their ethnicity. There's further issues that stem from the same sources, such as banks refusing to loan to Afro-Americans at a disproportionate rate, even with high wages and a more stable income, being refused even an interview because your name doesn't sound white enough despite being the most qualified applicant, etc etc etc.

DEI being implemented in a way that chooses non-white, women, differently abled, or LGBTQ+ simply to check a box and have diversity to point to is a real issue, but these places weren't ever really interested in leveling the playing field. They were concerned about optics. Like the 90s movie/tv cliché of the group of popular pretty girls having the one "fat and ugly" friend in the group to show that they're inclusive, to make themselves look and feel better.

DEI if implemented properly strips the unconscious and systemic bias in American (and other countries) systems to overlook better candidates for white, straight men.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] conartistpanda@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 14 hours ago

That explains Trump's problem with it. He can't stand the idea he'd be the bottom.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

This isn't a good argument in general--you can call anything anything, even if it doesn't fit what it actually is. This would be like accusing someone of being anti-democracy for opposing the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea), or anti-life for opposing the "pro-life" movement.

Whether the label is accurate in any given circumstance doesn't change the fact.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 11 points 21 hours ago

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
- Not Voltaire

[–] bluelander@lemmy.ml 5 points 18 hours ago

This 1000%. Stop separating your words from their meanings.

Say what you mean and mean what you say.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Two kinds of people: the heterosexual white man and the diversity hire

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

Christian heterosexual white man. Can't have any of those minority religions, or worse atheists, sneaking in.

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 0 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

That's a stupid take tbh. Nobody is against those things. What people have a problem with is the side effects. Very obvious to see in the entertainment sector where entire historic events and facts are ignored for the sake of DEI. Saw that with the cleopatra movie and is currently a big problem with assassins creed shadows which is literally insulting large parts of japanese culture just so they can put their western morals into it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›