this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
153 points (96.9% liked)

Data is Beautiful

1436 readers
198 users here now

Be respectful

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 points 12 minutes ago

Whoa, wtf is Polandball doing?
I didn't know such differences still existed (not counting USA ofc).

[–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 40 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think I've ever seen what appears to be a line graph loop back on itself.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 8 hours ago

Visualise it as a 3d graph seen from the top.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)
[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 13 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

But in this graph it's correct, isn't it?

A bit of a strange choice of axis, but technically it's correct, I think.
We see how during COVID people died earlier although expenses went up (didn't check the dates, but I guess that's the thing?), and afterwards expenses went down, but people grow older again
Or do I completely misunderstand this?

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 3 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, it's correct. What they did is, for every year they place a dot with respect to x and y axis, then connected the dots. An unusual graph, but works well for this situation, IMO.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think they're cringing, this is perfectly correct.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

By the definition:

A function f from a set X to a set Y is an assignment of one element of Y to each element of X.

~/s~

[–] InfiniteFlow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

This is not a function graph, though. It is a Connected Scatterplot.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 2 points 4 hours ago

Not to worry, it’ll soon dip back down as the Almighty, who is also the Invisible Hand Of The Free Market, wills

[–] julianwgs@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Can we please always link to the original data?

[–] will_a113@lemmy.ml 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Can you guess when HMOs became a thing (and Blue Cross converted from not-for-profit to for-profit)?

[–] Balthazar@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] will_a113@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 hours ago

I was asking rhetorically since the graph makes it pretty obvious, but actually re-reading this article it's a bit more complex than I recalled. There was basically some legislation in the mid 1970s that made them possible, the model grew through the 80s, but by the late 80s low-rent HMOs had taken over, and a crippling combo of regulation (to create new barriers to entry) and deregulation (for the existing guys) basically cemented the for-profit HMO/PPO providers that we all know and love (haha) by the 1990s. Had we held out for another decade we probably would have seen socialized medicine by the Clinton-era, but instead we got this graph, where we pay more and get less than everyone else, and half the country thinks it's a great idea.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] abfarid@startrek.website 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 points 10 minutes ago

Too chilly hot to chilly chill.

[–] a14o@feddit.org 5 points 8 hours ago

INTERNATIONAL DOLLAR (PPP)

COUNTRY MONEY (GDP)