this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
495 points (97.7% liked)

People Twitter

5518 readers
1717 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] casmael@lemm.ee 19 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks to everyone who called me a lunatic for suggesting this might have been rigged through ballot stuffing

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 16 hours ago

Americans, especially liberals, have a phobia of calling out mass cheating by authority figures.

It’s like they need law and order so much, they are willing to ignore what is obvious. When a subject is taboo it’s not talked about , not dismissed, not encouraged

If exit polls don’t work in your state, and there is no physical ballot counting. And when tests on precinct numbers show strong suggestion of altering votes and the democrats always always underperform, it’s obviously a new phenomena, totally ok. Let’s just stop predicting elections early based on exit polls!

One such test post election for any state:

Arrange all precincts in the state by population and see if there a curve on the more people there are there, the more percentage of votes a particular candidate gets: if it’s only that candidate and it’s a smooth curve upwards that’s unnatural: California has no such correlation but some other states fail.

One should see a random looking up or down plot, or a straight line, or sorta straight. Not a growth curve. That’s because common tactic world wide to alter computer votes is to ads the extra votes based on precinct size.

Usually each state has easy to get data this way to one’s own source if amusement and the dozens of others who are thinking this might be interesting. Occasionally someone publishes graphs of it to thunderous uncaring.

It’s not the only problem but it’s the easiest way for non computer people to understand there is more to this

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 53 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

So Musk was involved in something to do with the voting machines?

Hmm…

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 27 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Well that's cause for investigation of at least the Pennsylvania vote, right?

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 18 hours ago

We can investigate all we want but Trump isn't getting punished. Neither is Musk.

We will coronate our first king today.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I recognize Juan Guaidó as interim president of the United States until we figure out what happened

[–] microphone900@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 hours ago

Agreed, it's the only thing that can and should be done. And, I mean, look at how good a job he did at the last place he led.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 18 hours ago

"Start free trial now"

As opposed to the costly and constrained trials ending with "fuck it, he gets off scot-free because we dragged our feet on purpose and he's above the law again"

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 15 hours ago

BIG NEWS! START FREE-TRIAL NOW!

Oh good how could I afford to miss that huge breaking story, didjya hear fellas? Newsmax is offering free trials!

Whoever runs that channel should be taken behind the barn and put to pasture.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

is this a veiled threat? lol

[–] BearGun@ttrpg.network 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's not a threat, it's an admission of guilt.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›