this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
1182 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

6018 readers
1530 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

If a rat has a better developed sense of empathy than you do, then you've probably made some seriously awful life choices somewhere along the line.

[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think we shouldn't underestimate human empathy. The problem is just that we build structures to avoid it. Rich people choose to not see poor people too much or they would feel empathy and be inclined to help them. If the poor are far away, merely an abstraction that is said to exist, then their existence is not felt strongly enough to trigger an empathy response. Surely there are exceptions to some degree, but I think humans are very empathetic and that's one of our great powers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Couldn't this be explained by the "tit-for-tat" hypothesis? That selfless behaviour is learned in communal animals, and that its implied it will be you who need help next time?

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

There is a bat species that I think feeds on blood, and they share the food they managed to get in a night, if a bat refuses to share one night then the next time they get left out of the sharing.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] SkyJuice@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah to a degree, maybe it was some kinda low sugar chocolate or something

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 18 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Which is why rats never built empires and conquered the world

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 14 points 3 days ago

In many cities, there are more rats than human. And yet, who feeds who?

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 10 points 3 days ago

or destroyed it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Empathy over natural selection ftw.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Empathy was created by natural selection - of groups, not individuals, of course.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Why do you say the rats are better than us? Humans can be observed doing the same in similar circumstances.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

~~Some~~ Most humans. The notable (but not exclusive) exceptions being people who manage to become ultra-wealthy.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

On the other hand, they willingly live in sewers and their sense of smell is stronger than ours.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

But good or bad is still subjective.

E: maybe a little broad. I meant pleasant smells. In the case of rats probably dictated by biology.

You'd probably willingly live next to a bakery.

[–] SpaceXplorer_8042@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well, everyone's got their kinks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

have you considered that no longer hearing cries of healp is reason enough

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›