this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
143 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

59342 readers
5221 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] galaxies_collide@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is a massive leap from the Folding@home project. From 4 million to 71 million is insane!

[–] frustratedphagocytosis@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Back in the day, I'd be thrilled to read something like this, but now all I hear is 'look at how many new ways the Google overlord can fuck humans up with protein mutations to eliminate fragile meat-based enemies'

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

That's ridiculous sci-fi fantasy
- cough -
Anyone else have a sudden urge to be more open with their location sharing?

[–] PreviouslyAmused@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I want to believe this, but given how wonky AI bots have proven to be as of late, I can’t help but think that you can cut this number down by several million

[–] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

In my field where Google "throws" their huge DL models at problems as well, the papers they publish tend to have very limited explanation of how and why the model works and they don't really provide a comprehensive validation of the model. So I find it difficult to trust their findings here, not only by looking at LLMs but also their "scientific" models.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

Great, it's done by Google. But good thing they're identified, I guess.