this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
665 points (85.3% liked)

memes

10407 readers
1807 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I for one have stopped posting any content to lemmy.ml communities.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm out of the loop, what's going on?

[–] antiykns@thelemmy.club 6 points 50 minutes ago

Virtual berlin wall crisis. Americans have drawn the whole lemmyverse with their election shit and now they whine because people comment mean things on their internet.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Why would you want to create an echo chamber? I genuinely don't get it, it's the internet, if you encounter an opinion you disagree with, literally just close the tab and it's gone

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Most people on here don't mind being exposed to different viewpoints. If you ask me, even some - or even most, IDK - tankies are fine to talk to, even argue with, as they are usually civil.

The problem is that there are a lot of users on the *.ml instances who are not interested in debate, they just keep repeating the same 2-3 slogans over and over again in smug superiority as a reply to everything, and mods ban people randomly the same way.

When you meet some users who reply "you are misled by Western media" to anything you say as a final and incontrovertible argument, that's not a good faith debate I'm willing to participate in.

The problem is not the differing opinions, but the differing norms for polite conversation and good faith arguments.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 34 minutes ago

just keep repeating the same 2-3 slogans over and over again in smug superiority

Sounds like most of political/ideological Lemmy to me.

[–] starbrite@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Posting this to lemmy.world, lol

[–] antiykns@thelemmy.club 0 points 28 minutes ago

Right? The gensiders whining that their fav gensider lost are gonna give lessons about censorship it's pathetic X)

[–] helloworld55@lemm.ee 9 points 11 hours ago
  • posted on *.world
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 22 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (17 children)

"We should defederate from everything which does not agree with my .world view and create a giant centralized echo chamber"!

Why the fuck does every .world user suddenly want Lemmy to be Reddit?

[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 0 points 30 minutes ago* (last edited 22 minutes ago)

We should defederate from everything which does not agree with my .world view

I will try to formulate this as well as I can:

"One should not give a platform to instances which don't give a platform to others."

Examples (based on hexbear):

  • in some communities you get banned for voting the wrong way --> other instances don't practise banning for votes

  • in some communities you get banned for being "reactionary" (that is, factual - Wikipedia would get banned just as quick) --> other instances only ban bigots, not people who politely disagree with locals

  • in some communities, there is no obvious recourse to get a ban reviewed and reversed --> on other instances, there is a metacommunity about management or instructions about how to challenge a ban

The result: certain instances are granted a platform by others, but aren't granting a platform to "foreigners" in return. And management habits in some places are straight from North Korea.

Defederating from an echo chamber doesn't make your instance an echo chamber, unless you follow up by adopting the policies of the echo chamber you defederated from.

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 17 points 13 hours ago (19 children)

Personally I would like to be able to talk to people with different views, in a civil manner. But Lemmy.ml doesn't seem to want that. If you post something that they don't like (even if it's a very moderate view and is expressed in a completely civil way) then they ban you. They seem to really hate moderate people.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 1 points 39 minutes ago

Being banned means less of a problem for you - got a reason to ignore them and let them echo chamber however they want.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›