this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
68 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

59415 readers
2808 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm confused. They said if Google wants to use it, they have to pay, so Google went to remove it, and now they're saying Google can't remove it?

[–] moody@lemmings.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Google is trying to pick and choose who to filter out of results.

The SEPM claims that Google was preparing to test a scheme that would exclude articles from specific media outlets with which it is in dispute over rights to online news content.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago

Yeah. They said they didn't want Google to do anything without paying, so Google is removing them. Is that not what they wanted?

If those sites think that being linked to is a service they're providing Google (which demanding payment implies), then Google is just fulfilling their wishes.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Considering that some searches right now tend to be thirty different "news" sites republishing the same article... I dunno how to feel about this.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

That was always the way, big news pulled from the likes of the AP and Reuters and rephrased. A lot of today's just isnt rephrased.

[–] gnygnygny@lemm.ee 0 points 3 days ago

French medias and newspapers probably got too much readers