this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
940 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

59626 readers
2881 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Translation: all the times Tesla has vowed that all of its vehicles would soon be capable of fully driving themselves may have been a convenient act of salesmanship that ultimately turned out not to be true."

Another way to say that, is Tesla scammed all of their customers, since you know, everyone saw this coming...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 180 points 3 weeks ago (15 children)
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 84 points 3 weeks ago

"Trust me, you just need to buy more compute for your car. We'll figure out reliable driving by sight someday."

[–] aaron@lemm.ee 38 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Elon Musks make engineering orders of magnitude more difficult. Those poor Tesla neoslaves

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

They were on the path of self driving cars till Musk pulled the plug on the LiDAR and opted for cameras (cost less). He is directly responsible for why autopilot isn’t so auto.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago

It’s got something way better: LieAr

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

We'll fix that, the car will be driving fully autonomously 2018, promise!

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Atom@lemmy.world 143 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (18 children)

First, let me clarify I bought my Tesla used, before Musk went full fascist, and autopilot came free. The car was updated to the newest hardware for free, since the original FSD equipment couldn't do it either.

That out of the way, FSD sucks, and it's getting worse, not better. When if first come out of beta it was okay. I remember describing it as driving with a teenager, they got the general idea, but would make bad decisions so you had to watch them. Years of updates later and it's practically unusable to me. It tries to go way under or over the speed limit, it hesitates or slams on the brakes for green lights. It slams on the brakes for cars that pull out with plenty of gap but doesn't even notice the risky merges. It can not seem to navigate intersections anymore, damn near stopping in the middle of a turn. It actually just updated yesterday and I tried it again, it took me less than 5 miles to disable it again. It is, in my opinion, a hazard to use. I talked to my partner about it and we both agree it didn't used to be this bad.

Anyway, the stupidest part of all this, is they changed it so it's either full self driving all the time or not. You want cruise while you're in traffic because you know it'll try to cut in front of someone? Silly idiot, no you don't. So you now have to have a second profile* for cruise control and lane keep without FSD. And the odd thing is that lane keep and cruise are fine. They function like FSD used to. They can drive the highway with no problem and trust me, I do not have much faith in the car so I'm watching it close. It can't navigate city streets, but neither can FSD....

TLDR, my car was a better deal for me than Tesla. After years of FSD access, it's bad and getting worse, not better. I can't believe people pay 5 figures for it and maybe that's why they feel the need to clip perfect drives or defend it.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 79 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I think car automation peaked at adaptive cruise control. It's a simple tractable problem that's generally well confined and improves the drivers ability to concentrate on other road risks.

[–] Atom@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree with that. Adaptive cruise and lane keep do reduce road trip fatigue in my experience. Tesla-bros bought the idea that this would be a fully autonomous car and it's not. Rather than learning their lesson and using it as a tool, they put their faith in it anyway, weighting the wheel or whatever to get what they paid for regardless of what the car can reliably do.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Though they can induce another type of driver fatigue - it makes driving boring as heck as you don't need to do anything. I can't use line keep myself as it just makes me really tired and I'll risk falling asleep.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I agree. VWs' drive assists are absolutely stellar. It's just line assist, speed limit recognition with cruise control and active distance assist, that's essentially it. It's not FSD but on the highway it almost feels like it. I was very skeptical and distrusted the sensors at first because my previous car had none of that, but after a while I got very comfortable with them.
I can even safely get something out of my bag on the passenger seat without worrying that the car is going to fly of the road if I take my eyes of it for a second.

The only thing that kind of annoys me, but that goes for all line assists, is that they don't seem to follow a center line between the road markings, rather they bounce around inside a "zone" with margins left and right.
So if you are on the inside of your "zone" and approach a sharp turn, the car enters the outside margin at a fairly steep angle and often skims the outside road markings before bouncing back. It just feels like the assist is on a constant rubber band, so I don't really trust it with high speed turns.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 31 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

That out of the way, FSD sucks, and it's getting worse, not better.

It's almost like they bet on the AI to teach the AI, rather than continuing to pay for skilled engineers.

Buckle up folks, we're going to see a lot more of this, across every industry, before the lawsuits go into high gear and anything gets better.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

Sounds like it'd be nice if you had real control over the car's software, and you could roll it back.

This... also makes me a little more weary driving around Teslas in traffic.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 101 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

He and Trump deserve each other.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 88 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think his intense commitment to getting Trump elected makes more sense when you consider this article.

His enormous wealth is largely stored in the form of Tesla stock, and that stock has been valued based on the belief that it isn't a car company, it's a robotaxi service currently selling the hardware to finance the software development. The value -- and his wealth -- can persist indefinitely as long as investors continue to accept that premise, no matter how long delayed. But if something tangibly undermines that premise, Musk could conceivably lose the majority of his wealth overnight.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Agency is probably the greatest threat to his wealth. He doesn't worry about competitors or protestors or Twitter users or advertisers. They're all just petty nuisances. But the federal regulator over roads... that is his proverbial killer snail. And I think fully capturing the entire federal regulatory state is his strategy to permanently confine that snail.

More than anything else, I think that's what is motivating his radical embrace of fascism.

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Aren't they all motivated by wealth and greed?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 29 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Sometimes I'm reminded that there's always a chance that they go submarine diving or some such with another overconfident crony who thinks their skills got them where they are today.

[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

I would like them to try to go to Mars this coming January. I am sure with enough fuel one of Elons rockets can get it moving in the right direction, they can wing everything else as they go.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Prethoryn@lemmy.world 94 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Can't wait for the supporters to come out and gas light buyers instead: "uh, well of course they couldn't. He didn't lie you just don't understand tech...!

I work in IT and people that think like that can fuck themselves. "What do you mean Meta lied by selling your data to a company you didn't know about. Maybe you should just have never trusted Meta."

Stupid fucking boot lickers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 82 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, so it turns out that "genius billionaires" only exist in comic books?

Nobody could have seen that one coming!

[–] Throw_away_migrator@lemmy.world 69 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Translation: all the times Tesla has vowed that all of its vehicles would soon be capable of fully driving themselves may have been a convenient act of salesmanship that ultimately turned out not to be true."

There's a word for that already. Lied. They/He lied.

No need for 30 words when 2 will do.

They Lied.

[–] bad_alloc@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Maybe one extra world: They lied maliciously.

Also, they did so repeatedly, over a very long time and while it must have been fully apparent with insider knowledge that this setup cannot work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 54 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

salesmanship

You mean false advertisement

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 40 points 3 weeks ago

Worse than that. Fraud. He's scammed people out of millions.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 21 points 3 weeks ago

Or just fraud

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago

It's pure grift.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 48 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Never buy a product for a non existent feature that’s promised in update.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This smacks of the hyperloop, a false product offered to suppress support of other competing products.

Id est, a high-capital entity using their power to suppress competiton for smaller (more sincere) interests.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 12 points 3 weeks ago

This 100%, too many musk fanboys don't understand how much he is actually hindering innovation.

Even at SpaceX they make more progress when he isn't involved.

[–] pubquiz@lemmy.world 38 points 3 weeks ago

This is the epitome of American "ingenuity" as it promises, promises, promises, and no-one ever actually delivers.

Just. Like. Trump.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 35 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Took my first drive as a passenger in a FSD Tesla the other day. I was rapidly underwhelmed. I mean, yeah...it's pretty cool the car drives itself, to an extent. But even as a passenger I was struck by the number of times I would have taken the wheel and made the car do what it was supposed to. Hesitant pulling forward to turn, hesitant pulling out into traffic after a turn, wrong speed for the road, abrupt turns... Did it get us there? Sure. Did it do a good job? Mid at best. Probably better as an anti-fatigue measure on highway drives instead of taking you places in town. I would not pay for FSD were I to own a Tesla...at least it seems really inappropriate for the kind of driving I do.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org 29 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

I believe that some technological ideas can work. The problem is that ideas that are under people like Musk, are doomed to always fail and will be seen as negative.

Elon Musk sucks.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 19 points 3 weeks ago

As ever, things that succeed with Musk as the figurehead succeed despite him not because of him.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 weeks ago

Lying liar lied. News at 11.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago

This was the inevitable result even years ago. When self-driving cars were the hot topic and several companies were doing their own thing, that's when it should have been obvious it was never going to happen. It's not a problem any one independent company was ever going to solve, especially quickly. For to work it would have to be an open source, global standard with several companies working together.

I mean you'd have to build out a massive amount of infrastructure to further support it. All vehicles would have to have a module in it that would communicate with everything else around it, regardless if it was self-driving or not. There can't be a premium model, or a subscription, ect., it would need to just be there and work.

The overall task to get this done was never going to be quick, easy, or cheap. This was always going to be bigger than any one single company and a handful of engineers. It's going to take the effort of many companies and governments all working selflessly.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 24 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I can't help but think he's saying this now as an attempt to distract from the stories of "Musk has been talking to Putin since the spring when they were both faced with problems: Musk being forced to buy Xitter and Putin unable to steal Ukraine. Odd how Musk has been becoming more rabidly pro-Russian-interests, isn't it?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aniki@lemmings.world 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

My Leaf can handle itself on the highway and it's the perfect amount of self driving that I want. I also didn't need to pay half the price of the leaf for the privilege.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago

He realizes this every couple of years and then he forgets again during the next shareholders meeting

[–] bender223@lemmy.today 14 points 3 weeks ago

Wow, what a genius!

/s

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Maybe he shouldn't have called it "autopilot."

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Surprised if he is truly capable of even this level of self reflection.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Billionaires also fall into the Gartner hype cycle. And convincing a billionaire there’s an opportunity to automate workers out of a job is a quick way to get an injection of cash.

It’s going to be generations before we are actually able to automate most labor. But long, long before that AI will be capable enough to replace overpaid CEO’s.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He's just trying to sell the upgrade so people will throw away their old cars and buy new ones. But that already happened with the last version and it still can't do it. This won't be any different with him in charge. Put an engineer in charge, invest in the tech, and you might get there. But Tesla is not going to ever get there while it needs to sell every incremental advance in tech rather than spending time and money on lots of iterations of prototypes that don't need to be mass produced.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 12 points 3 weeks ago

The thing with (full) self-driving is that the edge cases are the challenge. Driving is the Pareto Principle really cranked up: (fully made up numbers) 2% of the driving represents 90% of the difficulty. And highway driving is a much simpler task to be automated than driving on a stroad, weird intersections, unprotected turns, etc.

I think we are a long ways off from full self-driving, and highway driving capabilities of current vehicles only address what is by far the easiest scenario. And even there those capabilities are limited from what I've seen.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Over Promise under deliver

load more comments
view more: next ›