this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
435 points (91.9% liked)

Technology

58999 readers
4259 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The question that everyone has been dying to know has been answered. Finally! What will scientists study next?

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Their assumptions must be wrong. They do not account for the most basic principle of the universe, "the show must go on."

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 17 hours ago

If a tree folds in the forest and there's no one there to hear it does it make a sound?

For this experiment scientists recruited Gilbert, no one really pays much attention to him, and it's assumed the universe won't either.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The author is so stupid, the monkey will of old age long before the universe ends.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

But first he will accidentally the whole thing.

[–] lando55@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Has He Anyone Really Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to do Look More Like?

[–] BaneOfStuff@lemmy.world 16 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Not with a typewriter, though.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago

I would place money on some enthusiast somewhere having typed up Hamlet on a typewriter just for kicks. Surely in the hundreds of years of overlap between humanity, Hamlet, and typewriters, it's happened once. I'd be more concerned with typos.

[–] Kethal@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago

Use infinite monkeys.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 18 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

As such, we have to conclude that Shakespeare himself inadvertently provided the answer as to whether monkey labour could meaningfully be a replacement for human endeavour as a source of scholarship or creativity. To quote Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 3, Line 87: “No”.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 9 points 21 hours ago

To quote Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 3, Line 87: “No”.

Stealing this to be annoying with

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Skoobie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Alright then. 2 monkeys... 3? 4? The answer has to be a number lol.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Oh yeah? Name ONE ape that wrote Shakespeare. Go on I’ll wait

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

He’s probably got a dumb name, like Bill or Willie.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

Let's use our braincells to fix real problems first. Like pants that don't stretch.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 5 points 21 hours ago
[–] maxenmajs@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

I feel like there has to be more to this problem than pure probability. We ought to consider practical nuances like the tendency to randomly mash keys that are closer together rather than assume a uniform distribution.

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Who are you, who is so wise in the ways of science?

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 1 points 15 hours ago

And coffee breaks... or banana breaks... and unions!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›