this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
83 points (96.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54574 readers
368 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Is this new? Does anyone what the deal is?

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 73 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We are at war comrade

1000030873

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 60 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Probably because Google is actively and frequently banning many Piped or Invidious hosts, and is generally currently at war with "alternative frontends" to YouTube in an effort to make users browse YouTube directly and consume ads there, or buy YouTube Premium. This is in line with their current fight for more ad revenues across their products and services. You probably have to either search for another public instance which isn't banned (yet) from accessing YouTube, or host your own instance.

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

Can confirm it. Self-hosting Invidious on my laptop is working.

[–] TacticsConsort@yiffit.net 37 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I've had some issues with Invidious being unable to play specific videos once or twice, but the issues tend to go away after a couple of days.

I mean, we know Google and Youtube are both multi-billion-dollar corporations that are absolutely enraged by the idea that there could be any possible way for a commoner pleb like you to NOT have your online experience absolutely crammed with as many privacy violations and hyper-targeted ads as possible. Invidious having to constantly stay ahead of such powerful entities' attempts to block them out means that some errors and periods of downtime are perfectly excusable- what's important is continuing to support them in their fight.

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

The Invidious issues on public instances haven't gone away in 1-2 months)...

But you can still self host it locally.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It says "the video might be inappropriate for some users". Afaik those videos never worked because they required login with Google account

[–] WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

they did work before. Maybe they got more restrictions on age restricted videos now

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Recently they changed something that made age restricted content no longer work, for me both the grayjay app and ytdlp both stopped working for them a few days back

[–] dan@upvote.au 7 points 2 weeks ago

It's the same in SmartTube. Age-restricted videos haven't worked for a while, even if logged in.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 10 points 2 weeks ago

Is this 'Sign in to protect our community'?

[–] jlow@beehaw.org 8 points 2 weeks ago

Make Peertube more known! Tell your fav people on YT!

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What version are you running? They released a new version of Freetube today.

both have the issue but so does individious and every single youtube frontend at the moment

[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Reason I don't use Freetube is it will never show age restricted videos because it doesn't sign into YouTube your also limited to a max of 1080.

it used to work with age restricted videos though and their newest update allows more that 1080p.