this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
785 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

58757 readers
4324 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 21 points 10 hours ago
[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 52 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

How about making them such a high percentage that it would genuinely impact their bottom line and not a measly amount calculated as "cost of doing business"

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

4% of gross revenue is not a negligible amount. For no company.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 8 points 13 hours ago

Probably, but it would depend on how much gross revenue they make on said practice, and how often they get a fine.

[–] Disgracefulone@discuss.online 6 points 12 hours ago

Do it if you're bad

[–] MiltownClowns@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

and this is why we dont fuck with the chinese wall

[–] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 59 points 20 hours ago
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 68 points 20 hours ago

Less considering more doing

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 99 points 23 hours ago

Do it. The crimes are almost entirely by him personally, and had unprecedented damage. He should be responsible with all his money - a Twitter-sized blow would be a slap on the wrist as the platform is worth just $5B or thereabouts.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 40 points 23 hours ago

It's finally time to hold the people hiding behind the companies accountable!!

woohoo!

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

break his ability to finance the orange felon

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 118 points 1 day ago (18 children)

fine the fucker for 20% of his net "worth", that should give him some pause

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 129 points 1 day ago (2 children)

WOW. That's interesting. Kinda brilliant if it works. Wouldn't work in the US, unfortunately.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 55 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That would be extra funny, considering at least some motivation behind his initially bidding on Twitter, was to cash out his absurdly overvalued Tesla stock, without causing it to crash.

Clearly he signed that initial Delaware contract while he was still riding high on mania, but still, his desire to convert his overpriced Tesla stock played no small part. The remaining rationale was mostly drug-induced psychosis, but I digress.

So, calculating fines based on his overpriced assets, forcing him to sell off a bunch of those shitty assets, and risking their price falling closer to their true worth, would be hilarious.

It's also why I am skeptical that they'll do it, or at least I'm skeptical they'll do it in a way that would trigger a domino effect, or market contagion.

load more comments
view more: next ›