this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
1095 points (97.2% liked)

solarpunk memes

2736 readers
294 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] superkret@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

No, they wouldn't. Capitalism is driven by supply, not demand.
If by some magic we switched to renewables over night, the owner class would open or expand another market to keep those ships moving.

[–] philpo@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah, that worked totally well for the Guano and sodium nitrate businesses.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oil is used for more than just energy.

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Idk why you're being downvoted. Petrochemicals are used for a bunch of stuff, including plastics manufacturing.

We should switch to renewables as quickly and completely as we can, but it wouldn't eliminate 100% of oil use

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I argue that if oil wasn't as cheap, ecological alternatives to plastic would have a chance or would be considered at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Steve@startrek.website 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yo, you right

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

I'll allow it.

Bill McKibben is based.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As nice as it would be, a not insignificant amount of coal being transported is destined to steel production. Steel is iron + carbon, and the easiest source of carbon is coal. Steel is pretty important, so that's not going away anytime soon. I wonder if carbon capture could make a product that could be used to replace coal here though, and fairly effectively sequester the carbon in an actually useful form?

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What biomass grows the fastest without being waterlogged - I imagine bamboo or sugarcane or something

Grow that, and burn it to make carbon neutral steel; bonus points if you do it in a highrise/underground farm but frankly some medium term reversible environmental damage is preferable to killing off way more with climate change

[–] Phineaz@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eh, purity is a thing. Biomass is the opposite of what you want there, but it could be doable. I do wager, however, that the largest "climate cost" of steel comes from the repeated melting of the steel.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Coal has a bunch of impurities compared to charcoal I thought?

And if the repeated melting is done by burning biomass/charcoal or with clean(er) energy then it's not a huge issue

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›