this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
346 points (98.6% liked)

Antiwork

3586 readers
2 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

The new place for c/antiwork@lemmy.fmhy.ml

This server is no longer working, and we had to move.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.1k

Date Created: June 21, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library πŸ“š
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format β€œOriginal title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


Other Communities

c/workreform@lemmy.world


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

idk man I just need to vent i guess

my employer "provides" health insurance in exchange for my time and labor, and for that great privilege they take $600 out of my paycheck every month (covers me, my wife, and our 1yo son)

that's half our monthly mortgage payment; it's 2/3 our monthly grocery bill

why?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

Universal healthcare would probably not cost you that much with taxes. But instead a private company gets to reap all the benefits of your money.

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

"You should be grateful, peasant. That's a good looking kid you got there. It would be a shame if she got sick. What were you saying, again, I just got a notice about a stock price increase."

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (4 children)

As an employer I would LOVE to be shed of this system. I have no reason to be involved in the health care of my employees, and given the state of health care in America there is literally no upside for my business. It's all bad.

Unfortunately our system requires it, though. If I didn't offer health care and instead just increased the base salary I wouldn't be competitive. People would think I was trying to pull a fast-one on them, and few people in America know how to get health care on their own. It's a mess.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Our "lords" have already told us why things are the way they are if you look at the "reasoning" behind why the Senate let the child tax credits expire.

"People wouldn't have an incentive to work."

They literally use healthcare to chain you to a job. I have 3 coworkers that I know of off hand that have all said they literally are only working here for the health insurance...

This system can go to hell.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

"People wouldn't have an incentive to work."

As someone who lives in a place with universal healthcare, I would like to tell these people that many people here still work.

You know, food and shelter are also good incentives.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Hell, luxuries are all that are needed to work. If all my basic needs were taken care of I would still work because I like to travel and drink.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"People wouldn't have an incentive to work."

That is just their attempt at rationalization. The real reason is much simplier: money, money, money. Lobbyists, Super PACs and the donor class own our politicians. The rich pay for their political campaigns and bribe our politicians in some interesting and creative ways. For example, giving a politician a million directly is illegal, but if he writes a book and then you have the SuperPAC buy a million copies of the politicians book that is somehow legal.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Can PACs accept foreign money? Or does a politician have to run a little SPAC scam to accept that?

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Well the problem is that you are viewing it from a "normal person" vantage... you need to think of your employees as indentured servants, basically slaves you don't get to actually whip.

Once you get the proper Capitalist vantage point, you realize you can use this "benefit" to squeeze the life out of your employees, specially any of them with Chronic conditions or just a family, as they are hostages to the Health Care you provide!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stewie3128@lemmy.ml 53 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Your employer is likely paying another $600/mo for you as well, and singles/couples working for the company are actually subsiding your threesome.

The insurer-first system a stupid scheme that shouldn't exist in the first place.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] laverabe@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If you make less than $103,000 / year (family of 3) and pay more than 9.5% of your household gross income on healthcare premiums, you will likely save thousands by using your state's healthcare marketplace. You are likely eligible because they fixed the family glitch, now the 9.5% applies to the cost for family rather than individual coverage as before.

Although the subsidies will likely end after 2025 if dems don't retain a majority in house/senate.

It could easily save you thousands of dollars a year... Like I'm 100% of it... Ask me how I know, lol. Please look into it. I think you have to wait til open enrollment in December? or when your healthcare renews annually. You might be able to do it immediately due to "hardship". I don't know the specifics of your situation but I'm pretty sure you and a lot of other people here would save a lot of money. I would talk with a healthcare_gov or your state agency agent, they get paid by the gov't to help you through it at no cost to you. You can also get a low HDHP and get your own HSA to essentially pay no taxes for medical expenditures. I hear fidelity is good, due to no fees.

Speaking of which, is there an active financial advice community on Lemmy (like that old site that should not be named) like /c/financialplanning or something like that?

[–] laverabe@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I realize I'm in /c/antiwork so it goes without saying it'd be nice if we have universal healthcare without all this baloney money being siphoned to these criminal insurance companies. Just trying to help anyone out in a similar situation. ;)

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 5 points 3 days ago

Incredibly helpful information. You don't need to preface for a shitty situation you did not create or have the power to control. You've your part by providing care and empathy in the form of advice that might help some of us.

We got to use what we got for now. Can't survive on wishes and wants.

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Mine is about the same for family coverage, and the shocking thing is that it's pretty good relative to the market -- my previous employer was about ~100/mo cheaper for an equivalent HDHP plan, but I've seen much, much worse.

Honestly, though, even more than the cost (having run the numbers, the tax I'd pay in a European country to cover similar services is about the same, all things considered) is the sheer level of friction that insurers inject into the healthcare system. You have to get a referral to a specialist even if you know you need to see one. You have to get insurance authorization for specialty treatments. You have to think about deductibles and out-of-pocket-maximums, and Lord help you if you start having complex medical problems around the end of the year and the maximums reset in the middle of your treatment!

We pay out of pocket for a direct primary care pediatrician for our kid (on top of his insurance, to cover any meds or emergencies) and the fact that there's no insurance to deal with means that it's vastly easier to get a hold of her to get a medical opinion whenever there's a bad bump or a strange rash that needs a professional opinion. It's shocking to see how things could be if insurance companies and PBMs and for-profit hospital networks hadn't inserted themselves in between patients and doctors, with a sole eye towards making sure they pay out at little as humanly possible while maybe keeping patients alive in the process.

[–] leanleft@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

i get the feeling that society really doesnt want to spend the money to give people healthcare.

[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, at least here in the USA, we already are spending the money. Getting worse results than the rest of the world and spending more money on it. Because private health insurance is a joke and we're all the punchline.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Most Americans want universal healthcare. The problem is that we have a broken and corrupt system where our politicians are bought and owned by the donor class and lobbyists

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's 2 fold, one party doesn't want to takeaway private insurance because of the donor money. The other doesn't want "inferior" people to get health care.

A double edge sword unfortunately.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My options at my last 3 jobs have all been more than 1400/month.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you think your taxes would go up $17k per year if America got universal healthcare? I'm going to say probably not.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I'd gretly prefer universal healthcare.

[–] SirDerpy@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago (2 children)

In the US during WW2 employers couldn't keep employees because of wage competition. This made war production extremely inefficient and slow. The War Labor Board instituted wage ceilings for critical jobs. But, they allowed employers to compete with health benefits. Employment and healthcare became intertwined.

After WW2 the War Labor Board was dissolved and wage ceilings removed. FDR, who'd proposed and implemented The New Deal and led us through WW2, proposed the Second Bill of Rights aka the Economic Bill of Rights:

  • Employment

  • An adequate income for food, shelter, and recreation

  • Farmers' rights to a fair income

  • Freedom from unfair competition and monopolies

  • Decent housing

  • Adequate medical care

  • Social security

  • Education

This would've disaccociated employment and medical care. However, FDR was labeled a socialist and authoritarian, demonized. We the People bought into the propaganda.

That's how it's been for eighty years: The leftists propose the same platform FDR did. And, they're told to shut up for disturbing the idiots running in fear of one bad choice or another. All that's changed is the efficiency and effectiveness of the hegemony's propaganda.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SameOldInternet@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Insurance is extra expensive when you have a family in the US. I'm single and my monthly cost is less than $100 a month. Having a family is more expensive for everything.

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

But WHy dON't YoUNg poPLE wANT tO sTarT a FaMILy?!?!

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The private insurance industry is going to price themselves out of existence eventually. People are going to realize they can save an enormous amount of money by having the government act as payer for their healthcare instead of corporations trying to turn a profit. Healthcare already does not lend itself to distribution via capitalism, you don't show up to the ED and wave money around to bid on your bed. It should be based on need.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago

As long as people are allowed to go into debt, this industry and others like it will exist forever

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's likely 1/3rd to 1/2 of what the insurance actually costs.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

Insurance numbers in the US are all made up bullshit numbers designed to funnell money from the working class to the rich.

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (4 children)

America is a corrupt capitalist hellscape. It's why I don't have kids, only go to the doctor when shit happens and never pay the bill.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 14 points 4 days ago

Best thing that ever happened to me was almost dying. Now all of my healthcare, everything, is taken care of.

That's how fcked the world is.

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 days ago (5 children)

This is madness. Where I’m from, we have a nationalised healthcare system and yet my employer offers private healthcare coverage for no additional cost to myself (free)!

[–] Takeshidude@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

yeah that sounds like an employer actually providing a benefit in exchange for you working for them

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 0p3r470r@lemm.ee 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s bullshit, but your employer may be covering your insurance almost completely and that 600 goes toward your family. At least that’s how my insurance works. Again still bullshit that health care costs that much and then they won’t cover shit when you need it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kethal@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (4 children)

The fact that insurance is provided through employers in the US is strange. Other products are purchased directly. Presumably there's some advantage a sort of collective bargaining, but it doesn't seem to work out that way for this, in part because the employees aren't really part of the bargaining and in many places employees needs are too diverse to reach am agreement that works well for everyone.

Better solutions aren't coming any time soon. You can possibly make some better choices though. Although, not participating in the health insurance is borderline line crazy, dental and vision plans don't make sense for a lot of people. I would pay more for my dental plan than I pay to visit a dentist, including two annual cleanings, periodic x-rays, and infrequent work like cavities - basically the care you need to maintain tooth health. I don't get the dental plan. You can figure out your own out of pocket costs and see if a dental plan works for you. Going to a dentist that is not in an insurance network is the way to go when doing this. Offices in network are required by the insurance company to charge exorbitant fees to out-of-network customers (the dentists don't get the same pay from the insurance company though). So say a normal dentist charges $200 for a cleaning. A dentist in a network would be required to charge $400 or something nuts. If a patient is in network, it will say $400 on the EOB, and that the customer is responsible for $50, making it look like the customer saved $350. The insurance company only gives the dentist $150 though, so the dentist gets $200 anyway, the customer really only saved $150. The insurance company gets a bunch of money in annual fees from the employer.

You can see if it makes sense for you. Not everyone will be in the same situation, and maybe it doesn't eork out. If you have an option for an FSA or something similar, this option is even more attractive, since all those expenses can be paid from untaxed income, whereas the money taken out of your paycheck to cover insurance is after tax I believe.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί