this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
113 points (98.3% liked)

Fediverse

28480 readers
708 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 74 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Sadly thats fediverse, instance come and go as they like. Because behind them are humans that do this in their freetime ( most of the time out of their own pocket ). Big respect to everyone hosting a federated instance.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 17 points 2 months ago (5 children)

It shouldn't be like this. If we keep treating the Fediverse as just a scrappy, amateur effort, it will never reach its full potential and it will be forever just a niche thing.

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I actually kind of enjoy the "scrappy diy effort niche" thing.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

it's fine if you want to have it as a hobby. It's not fine if you want to destroy Big Tech.

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, I guess it's priorities. Destroying Big Tech would be pretty nice, but I'm really just here for the community.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Not to single you out, but this attitude is unbelievably frustrating. Everyone here loves to waste hours of their day signaling their virtue and complaining about all the evils done by the corporations, but so few are actually willing to put any skin in the game. they complain about entshittication from Spotify and Netflix, but religiously continue paying their subscriptions while refusing to support smaller, independent businesses.

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, you are not entitled to people being soldiers in your war against Big Tech. Like, I'd be totally for it, but some other time, nowadays I'm resting and being creative. Speaking of, not everyone here laps the crotch of Spotify et al. I'm a proud (but modest) pirate.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 months ago

I wasn't the one starting the protests against Reddit, and I am not the screaming at my computer whenever Elon Musk says something completely stupid.

I just thought that after all these years, more people have understood what "when you don't pay for the product, you are the product" really meant.

[–] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The fediverse will never destroy big tech unfortunately. In their worst case, they will incorporate it and easily dominate.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If not completely destroy it, at least make it irrelevant for those who want to avoid it.

The FOSS movement never destroyed Microsoft, but it arguably made it possible for us to live in a world where Bill Gates owned every PC software that we run.

[–] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In my opinion, the fediverse as it exists today is very vulnerable to domination by big tech. The only reason it hasn't happened yet is it is too small for them to care that much.

If the fediverse ever becomes mainstream, big tech will dominate it. If we want to fight big tech, we need to rethink our strategy and the fediverse, because right now, the fediverse is not ready to take it on.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How would that happen? If the core idea of "the Fediverse" is to have a loosely-connected network of servers and applications speaking a common protocol, how is it that they would use to "dominate" it?

I am not saying that Big Tech couldn't try to use it "open wash" their solutions, like Facebook and Google did with XMPP before. But what I am saying is that (like XMPP) I think it's virtually impossible for them to "dominate" something that is open.

I'm also not saying that the software we have is ready for the masses (it isn't) but all the issues I see are just a matter of implementation, not a fundamental design flaw.

[–] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's several vulnerabilities:

  • the fediverse unfortunately remains quite centralized. Most users wanna join the big servers. If it wasn't for the big servers literally driving people away, we would've been even more centralized
  • most people have no issue with corporate presence in the fediverse. They're okay with blue sky and okay with threads. In fact, clearly Gargaron is okay with meta and threads.
  • big tech already has a federated server that dwarves the rest of the fediverse combined: threads. Yes it's still not quite there yet, but if they complete its federation, they will dominate it.
  • gargaron showed he's okay selling out to Meta. What prevents another instance admin? A corporation could easily offer enough money to a handful of instance admins and control all these instances.
[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is not answering my question, or we have different ideas of what it means to dominate.

80% of email traffic is either Gmail or Outlook, yet none of Big Tech is able to control it fully. They can not force you to use their email server, and smaller providers still exist and are actually healthy business.

Is it hard to run an email by yourself? Yes. Is it impossible? Absolutely not. To me, that is what matters.

[–] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Then yes indeed were thinking differently. To me, email has already lost to big tech. The technical possibility of hosting email is there, but you can't even reach most users of the world without a lot of work.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What is your idea of "a lot of work"? Because I am perfectly happy with my $19/year service from migadu.com.

[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But you can already see the hurdles of large instance like lemmy.world.

The costs are so immense (probably because of some unoptimized code), the software isnt "ripe" enough that it can be left alone for few months and have it run smoothly. It needs permanent monitoring and maintenance. And that doesnt even go into the moderation issues.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 2 months ago

Aren't you kind of making my point?

I am saying that the Fediverse will only be sustainable if everyone pays a little bit. Relying on a few generous souls to make up for the thousands of freeloaders will always take every instance to a ceiling which is, frankly speaking, very low. LW has 18k MAU. This number is laughably low for any social network.

[–] rusty@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't know exactly what happened. But I'm guessing he was doxxed and bullied by activists based on this post https://tenforward.social/@zyd/113086796304683411

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 2 points 2 months ago (8 children)

I totally get where they're coming from with that shutdown announcement. I've had to "talk myself off a ledge" a few times to not go the same route and shut mine down. Ended up making some server policy changes that helped, but there's eventually going to be something else later.

If we keep treating the Fediverse as just a scrappy, amateur effort, it will never reach its full potential and it will be forever just a niche thing.

What suggestions do you have to change the way we're treating/running it currently?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] oblomov@sociale.network 1 points 2 months ago (9 children)

@rglullis @Rooki (OT: the last paragraph in the post has a couple of typos. I believe it should be TINSTAAFL (also I recommend making it an abbr for the less informed), and there is an “under” that should probably be “understand”)

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 13 points 2 months ago

I believe in co-op instance management solution like beehaw uses.

$2.00/year would mean i would require 200 active paying users per year. thats not too bad

the world as it is with its twitter/reddit is survivor bias. so many other social media sites have come and gone, why would the fediverse be any different?

eventually it will be instances who solved for the long-term problems of financial solubility and technical maintenance requirements.

[–] addie@feddit.uk 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Should have used Vim instead, that's a real text editor. No-one who starts using it ever moves on to something else.

[–] deuleb_biezelbob@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're refering to as Linux is actually Emacs plus Linux. Linux alone is not an operating system. It's just one component of a fully functioning Emacs system made useful by the Elisp interpreter, buffer editor, and vital system components comprising a full OS.

Some computer users run a modified version of the Emacs system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of Emacs which is widely used today is often called Linux, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the Emacs system, developed by the GNU Project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is used in combination with the Emacs operating system; the whole system is basically Emacs with Linux added. All the so-called Linux distributions are really distributions of Emacs plus Linux!

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There seems to be another side to this story as well. I'm not quite invested enough to dig into it, but it might not be such an awful loss.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 5 points 2 months ago
[–] Blaze@feddit.org 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was surprised I never heard of it, had a look, it's a Mastodon instance, so that makes sense.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I don't really care for micro blogging.

[–] Live_Let_Live@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Quick archive it All

Use archive.is or archive.org

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 months ago

If this later returns as ed.ch (more streamlined and lightweight, minimal featureset, perhaps not even the ability to store remote files so as to avoid the CSAM issues, etc) it'll be The Day.

load more comments
view more: next ›