this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
591 points (99.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

62574 readers
1016 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

looks like rendering adblockers extensions obsolete with manifest-v3 was not enough so now they try to implement DRM into the browser giving the ability to any website to refuse traffic to you if you don't run a complaint browser ( cough...firefox )

here is an article in hacker news since i'm sure they can explain this to you better than i.

and also some github docs

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pre@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago

This code will only ever be installed on my machines by force against my will.

No benefit to any users at all, all benefit only to Google and their Advertisers.

[–] ShroOmeric@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I quit the internet before I quit Firefox.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AzzyDev@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Question: Firefox renders certain DRM content in containers. Would that be applicable here? (Run unmodified site in container in background, load site content from that to user, and direct the attestor to the container so that the user can modify the site on the front end)?

[–] orowith2os@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (5 children)

The point of this is so that the user can't modify the site at all, despite what the proposal might say. Their goals and non-goals are contradictory.

Running this content in a container will not protect you. Just don't even try to adapt to it. Reject it completely.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] faintedheart@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I am pirating stuffs. They can't stop me. No other websites can stop me. Piracy sites are not going to use DRM. Firefox + ublock is heaven. Using it even for browsing lemmy as I like the mobile interface better than apps available right now.

Most probably firefox will also bring this or they will lose market share further which is already pretty low.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Can someone please ELI5 this?

[–] TheQuantumPhysicist@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

First they established a new standard for extensions that makes it harder for adblockers to work in chrome, that's manifest v3.

And now they want establish cryptographic verification of the environment so that you can't have a custom environment in your browser, like having adblockers. Similar to how DRM works.

As long as average Joe uses chrome, we're doomed.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›