this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
1527 points (98.2% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9776 readers
166 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 3 months ago

damn imperialist rat

[–] Xephonian@retrolemmy.com 18 points 3 months ago

There are plenty of reasons to hate Disney. If you're still paying for their content at this point, you are part of the problem.

[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

The happiest place on earth, y'all!

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's particularly entertaining because he's dead, so whatever agreement he made doesn't stop her from filing a suit. In other words, this is not a situation where someone who's currently alive had agreed to something in a click-through many years ago and is now suing.

One of the other interesting points of contract law that I think Disney will quickly lose is the fact that the agreement years ago was between two parties for something that happened years ago. They will have difficulty successfully arguing that what looked like a small scale deal that has long since ended actually had potential negative ramifications but only for one party, for the rest of their lives. If Disney were still giving him benefits up to his death, I think that could potentially be a different situation.

And as usual, depending on the level of negligence on Disney's end, it doesn't matter what he agreed to.

[–] tektite@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 months ago

In other words, this is not a situation where someone who's currently alive had agreed to something in a click-through many years ago and is now suing.

The wife was the doctor who died. The husband is who is suing and also who signed up for the D+ trial so yes it is but on behalf of someone who cannot sue as she is dead.

[–] Overwrite1@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Disney probably doesn't care if this argument holds in a court of law. If it does, jackpot, they now have a get out of jail free card due to case law. Their main objective is to wear down the plaintiff financially or mentally so that they drop the case.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 14 points 3 months ago

I can't believe nobody has mentioned the fact that it looks like Mickey is pissing over the disney logo in this image

[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The importance of piracy right here friends...

Seriously I hope this situation goes in favor of the widow.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why the fuck am I paying for Disney plus?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 4oreman@lemy.lol 9 points 3 months ago

Imagine if he had actually purchased it.

[–] imaginepayingforred@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

I only want to know how this ends

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›