Just waiting for some extremist to announce something in retaliation like 'truefreedom rideshare' where 'strong conservative men' can book a ride specifically with vulnerable women under some other buzzword naming.
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
41 points (91.8% liked)
News
23275 readers
3456 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I look forward to reading the their company policy on different genders sharing cars vs sharing bathrooms.
Good idea.
Judging by the comments on this post, many many men seem to be very upset about it.
Also wild comments saying things like "Oh, why not make a rideshare that forbids black people??"
Making things safer for women = discrimination against men?
Lots of men are making this about themselves. It's awful to see.
Making things safer for women = discrimination against men?
Yes, this feature is literally discriminating against men. Don’t deny the evident. However, does this mean that it’s bad? Not necessarily. Sometimes to make things safer for women you need to discriminate on the basis of sex.
Anyone got a non-paywalled archive link?
Sorry, no archive link. Best I can do is a copy & paste.
Lyft said on Tuesday that it was introducing a feature that would help match female drivers with female passengers on its ride-hailing app, in an effort to improve safety and encourage more women to drive with the company.
The feature, Women+ Connect, will allow women and nonbinary riders and drivers to make being connecting with each other for trips a priority by toggling on a setting in the app. They could still be matched with men when no women or nonbinary people were available nearby.
I assumed it was for the sake of the passengers (and customers choosing their preference isn't that big of a deal), but if it's about the employees of the company not being safe, then the company's not doing enough. For one, male drivers shouldn't be left on their own to deal with assaulters.
This sounds like a PR move rather than dealing with the problems.