this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
906 points (98.3% liked)

Greentext

6589 readers
1017 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RebiJes@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A lot of their success is due to their tactic of rushing into the enemy without any care for supply lines and logistics. This often worked to their advantage but most of those early wins were not sustainable in the long run. It gave the impression that they were more powerful than they actually were.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Leeroy jenkins is a short term solution

[–] Tekkip20@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

The baddie germans were the Leroy Jenkins of WWII, just charging in and expecting shit to work.

Didn't work out well when the sovvies clapped their cheeks all the way back to Berlin

[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Haha yeah

Wonder who this reminds me of

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Belgium 100% won that war

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago
[–] B312@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Tbf they did good for most of it

[–] sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They fought most of the rest of the world all at once and it was pretty touch-and-go there for a bit.

If Hitler had died of a meth overdose in early 1940 I could see the universe of 'The Man In The High Castle' coming to pass.

As it stands, meth heads gonna meth, and he decided fighting on 2 fronts was fine.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›