this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
1188 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39000 readers
2390 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“(With) today’s Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, that fundamentally changed. For all practical purposes, there are virtually no limits on what the president can do. It’s a fundamentally new principle and it’s a dangerous precedent because the power of the office will no longer be constrained by the law even including the supreme court of the United States.”

Throughout his address, Biden underscored the gravity of the moment, emphasizing that the only barrier to the president’s authority now lies in the personal restraint of the officeholder. He warned vehemently against the prospect of Trump returning to power, painting a stark picture of the dangers such an outcome could pose.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (10 children)

What Biden needs to do, like right fucking now, is pack the courts. AOC trying with a token effort to get them impeached is cute, but will ultimately fail because Republicans won't turn on their own. The Senate is tied (if you count Bernie as one of the dems) and Harris has the tiebreaker. The house is controlled by the Republicans, but only 7 individuals need to break from their party in order to get a simple majority to save the future of America.

Biden could expand the SCOTUS from 9 seats to 13 and immediately submit 4 liberal justices for confirmation to be seated. ~~Expanding the court doesn't require congressional approval, so Biden could do this unilaterally and~~ as long as he is able to get butts in those seats, they're there to stay even if Trump squeaks his way back in. They could then challenge and overturn the immunity ruling, as well as all the other dogshit rulings that have come out in the last couple of years like Dobbs.

He threatened to do it before. He needs to actually pull the trigger.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

This is all assuming that most of this isn't political theater, and I'm really starting to wonder how much of United States politics is actually genuine. So often the Democrats have had the opportunity to do something drastic, if less drastic then that frequently done by Republicans, to counteract the erosion of personal freedom and democracy. Yet they always seem to find a reason not to, typically with the justification that they don't want to push the envelope like the Republicans do, despite the fact the Republicans will continue to push the envelope to their benefit when back in power.

I'm starting to think a lot of this is bullshit.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Public: So do something about it.

Biden: I-i-i-if I do that, I'll be a baka.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 20 points 4 months ago

Kill them! Do it!

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Instead of issuing a scathing rebuke shouldn't he just mount a posse and pay them a visit now that he can do whatever he wants?

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Good for Biden. He is completely right here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago (5 children)

So, obviously he could just [redacted] the supreme court justices he doesn't like, appoint new ones, and then the only thing congress could do would be to expand the court or whatever, right? but then why couldn't he also just keep killing people in official acts until he gets a bunch of people that are like "yup, that was official and you don't need to do anything about it"? I know that's probably a slippery slope, right and would probably get him a shit ton of public pushback, especially after a certain point, from both conservatives, who predominantly make up the military, and economic power structures, to liberals who would prize decorum and "fair play" above all else (but I repeat myself), and so maybe that leads to a dissolution of society, which maybe leads to an even worse society as the people who control the levers of power are already the most horrible people, but, yadda yadda.

But, I dunno, how many congress people does he have to make go away, before the rest of them start to get the picture and then start to behave in their own self-interest, as they've always behaved? How many people do you really have to threaten in a system where the people who climb to the top are only going to be there out of their own extreme self-interest?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Gotta say i read that to the tune of "there are no cats in america"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

I never thought I'd say this, but can we channel a little Andrew Jackson energy in regard to the courts?

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Time to legally immediately replace every Justice except for Sotomayor and Jackson.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›