this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
844 points (98.1% liked)

Comic Strips

12744 readers
2373 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 68 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I don't plan to have a kid, so could someone explain it to me?

edit: when it's a parent..,.

[–] CEbbinghaus@lemmy.world 49 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Glad you got there. And look it took you significant less time than the guy in the meme

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

Wait, is any image now a meme? This isn't a comic strip, in Comic Strips?

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 months ago

Always has been. A meme is a self replicating unit of information. The meme exclusionists are just engaged in historical revisionism.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

By most definitions, comic strips inherently qualify as memes so yeah, this is both.

[–] ElderReflections@kbin.run 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But then like, isn't everything a meme? .. then nothing is a meme... woaaahhh

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Not really, no.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme

The comic strip format could be characterized as a memetic style of communication that has spread by imitation from person to person.

Such is not true of ferns, for example.

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The idea of ferns, as a decorative plant, is most definitely a meme.

However you are right that ferns, as a lifeform, fall under the category of genes.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Actually, ferns are a social construct.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You MAY be thinking of femmes 😁

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Those are a social construct too, because everything is.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think you might be confusing "social construct" for "things that there's a word for" 😄

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, reality is socially constructed, sociologists have been saying that for ages and it's true. http://soulism.net

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh. You're one of the "reality is not real" kooks 🙄

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

We're just far enough left to see that "hierarchies aren't self justifying" extends to reality too. We don't accept realist defeatism. Realism is an infant ideology of avoiding responsibility for reality, and saying "it's not my fault, it's reality".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Social_Construction_of_Reality

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You're mixing a lot of unrelated concepts here.

Just because authoritarians pretend that the status quo is inevitable and immutable doesn't mean that reality itself is a human invention made to justify it and other assumptions.

Likewise, conflating defeatism disguised as realism with the concept of reality itself is not just a giant leap of logic. It's a giant leap AWAY from anything resembling logical thought.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Reality isn't fake because it's defeatist, it just happens to be both fake and defeatist. It's fake because it was invented by rich white men in the 1600s to justify colonialism. And it's defeatist because most people today acknowledge those rich assholes were wrong about how the world should be, but not about how it is.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

[Reality is] fake because it was invented by rich white men in the 1600s to justify colonialism

Damn. That take is just as batshit insane as the right wing's worst conspiracy theories! Not anywhere near as malevolent and harmful, of course, but just as divorced from any sense.

And it's defeatist because most people today acknowledge those rich assholes were wrong about how the world should be, but not about how it is.

Acknowledging the current state of affairs as existing is not only not defeatism, it's absolutely CRUCIAL in order to effect any positive change.

Saying "it is" doesn't equal saying that it has to be. You can't effect positive change if you don't first acknowledge what the things that need to change are rather than pretend that it's all a shared hallucination.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Sure I can effect positive change while believing the bad stuff exists only in our heads. Our heads are where we live! Of course I want people to have better illusions in their heads. For example, if Trump wins then a bunch of queer Americans will experience a subjective sensation of being oppressed. That's horrible, so I'm asking Americans to vote for Biden.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sure I can effect positive change while believing the bad stuff exists only in our heads

Nope. That's literally impossible.

For example, if Trump wins then a bunch of queer Americans will experience a subjective sensation of being oppressed

Nothing subjective about it. Pretending otherwise is minimizing their real suffering and tantamount to victim blaming.

That's horrible

So is telling victims of oppression that they're only imagining it. Thus implying that they can just choose to stop being oppressed.

This is where your nonsense theory goes from childishly frivolous thought experiment to being actively harmful to the people whose best interests you claim to have in mind.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

Okay, so the difference between what I believe, and what you're saying I believe, is that I believe there are rules to how the mind works. You're saying if the mind were responsible for everything, then we would all have total control over our subjective worlds because a brain never did anything a consciousness didn't want. But I actually understand what psychology is, and that the conscious mind has its limits. Soulism is about gaining the tools to overcome those limits through hard work, not about instantly changing everything with wishes. Now, are you willing to accept the premise that the mind has limits, or are you going to continue along this assertion that soulism recognises no barriers to overcoming oppression?

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

A lot of comic strips do end up as memes

I'd say that it only "becomes a meme" once it's being shared around with small modifications, but when you see a comic for the first time then you might not know if that has happened already or not?

Edit, it's now a meme

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Originally, no, this wouldn't have qualified as a meme, but now it pretty much just means "any image that's shared online for the purpose of entertainment".

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 0 points 5 months ago

The definition is very vague now. And it definitely applies to any humorous images being spread using social media. And comics fall into that category.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 23 points 5 months ago

Congratulations on your child.

[–] Thediehlio@lemmy.world 46 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I thought it became a dad joke when it was full groan...

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 5 months ago

Oh my god thats so bad! but also so good!

[–] CEbbinghaus@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

This is absolutely the best dad joke I have seen so far

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I love that his face shows he’s thinking hard about it till he gets it

Edit why blue tie for wedding?

[–] Maven@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] nifty@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] nifty@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I know I know, stop mocking me with your perfect color perception

/jk

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago