Technology

59370 readers

4570 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

767

ChatGPT Answers Programming Questions Incorrectly 52% of the Time: Study (gizmodo.com)

submitted 5 months ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

186 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The research from Purdue University, first spotted by news outlet Futurism, was presented earlier this month at the Computer-Human Interaction Conference in Hawaii and looked at 517 programming questions on Stack Overflow that were then fed to ChatGPT.

“Our analysis shows that 52% of ChatGPT answers contain incorrect information and 77% are verbose,” the new study explained. “Nonetheless, our user study participants still preferred ChatGPT answers 35% of the time due to their comprehensiveness and well-articulated language style.”

Disturbingly, programmers in the study didn’t always catch the mistakes being produced by the AI chatbot.

“However, they also overlooked the misinformation in the ChatGPT answers 39% of the time,” according to the study. “This implies the need to counter misinformation in ChatGPT answers to programming questions and raise awareness of the risks associated with seemingly correct answers.”

(page 3) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Hey! I can keep my job for at least a few more years

[–] XEAL@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Still good enough for my needs.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

48% is still better than the Punxsutawney Phil.

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Billions and billions invested to produce accuracy slightly less than flipping a coin.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Voytrekk@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Just like answers on the Internet, you have to read the output and not just paste it blindly. I find the answers are usually useful, even if they aren't completely accurate. Figuring out the last bit is why we are paid as programmers.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Still the same shit study that does not even name the version they used...? The one posted here 1 or 2 days ago?

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Better than Jerry in the next cubicle over.

load more comments