this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
237 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

60086 readers
4435 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Moon mining gains momentum as private companies plan for a lunar economy::A number of entrepreneurial groups have shared their strategies to turn the moon into a hustle and bustle world of marketable services.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We should declare the moon like a national park (global park) and preserve it as is.

[–] Tilted@programming.dev 59 points 1 year ago (20 children)

Why? I would rather have preservation on earth, than on the moon.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

An airless desert impossible to reach for and with zero impact (even indirect) on the life of for 99.999% of people, with almost as much surface are as the whole of the Americas and which is entirelly devoid of life and always will be, is the last place you need to preserve.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ew. This sounds like massive public investment in space for massive private profits in space.

[–] Zoness@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looks like we'll be at our Expanse style dystopia sooner than expected!

[–] straysman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Rather expance style than say, the road

[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, if anything is going to get us there, and establish a permanent colony, it's corporate interests.

Can't wait for the first McDonald's on the moon.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlovedMadman@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's like we have learnt nothing, "let's strip another celestial body of its minerals then fuck off onto the next when we have had our fill."

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The difference is, there is no natural life to kill on the moon, and if it turns out to be possible, maybe even easier, to mine for necessary metals on the moon then Earth-side mining won't be necessary

Also, being able to get resources on the moon without having to ship them there from Earth will make it much easier and cheaper to launch spaceships to the rest of the solar system.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So I have two questions from that.

  1. How much mass can we remove from the moon until we affect it's rotation around earth?

  2. What will the ecological impact on earth be if a dozen companies start launching rockets at the moon on a regular basis?

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mining enough to alter the orbit of the moon would require a pretty ridiculous amount of time and effort. Much more than our global mining efforts combined and multiplied and on a timescale of thousands of years.

And we only have to launch a few rockets, enough to set up a self-sufficient base which can then produce more rockets and fuel from resources on site. Not to mention it's much easier, and even feasible with existing materials, to build a space elevator on the moon.

[–] BlovedMadman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Would it not be super cool to have all those minerals until we have extracted that much from the moon that it's orbit becomes unstable and then spirals into earth?

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

First, figure out how much the Moon weighs. The find out how much we mine form the Earth each year.

Second, the impact of dozens of flights a day will be much less than the impact of mining the Earth

[–] Wooly@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Pollute the moon all you want, better than earth.

[–] markr@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the shipping costs between earth and moon are ridiculous. Moon manufacturing only makes sense for supplying moon bases and transportation to other planets.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From Earth to the moon for sure, but once it's established, from the moon to Earth isn't as tough.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Wasn't the Moon's gravity low enough that you could basically use electromagnetic cannons to launch payloads from the surface all the way out of lunar orbit?

In the absence of an athmosphere and with only 16.6% of Earth's gravity, achieving orbit from the Moon isn't simply "not as though" as doing so from Earth, it's incredibly less so (maybe 100s of times, though I don't really have the numbers so take it with a grain) - just compare the full size (including boosters) and fuel payload of the vehicle needed to put 3 people on the Moon and those of the vehicle needed to bring them back to Earth (granted, the first vehicle had to also carry the second one, plus food, water and air for the first part of the trip).

Being at the bottom of a 1G well and having to also overcome quite a lot of air drag to get out of it massivelly adds up to the energy needed to do so, both because the whole getting out of a gravity well thing is a logarithmic progression (as you need to spend fuel to haul up the fuel that's going to be used higher u), so overcoming 6x the gravity doesn't just mean using 6x the fuel, and on top of that there are the the losses due to drag in the lower athmosphere which for example severely limit initial launch speeds (as drag is directly proportional to velocity).

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

If you haven't read it yet, try 'The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress,' by Robert Heinlein. It was written in the 1960s, so some of the tech is a teeny-weeny bit outdated but the story is still great.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't know anything about EM canons but between the moon having a relatively weak gravity well and being within Earth's gravity well, I'd think any method would be much easier to use when it comes to transport to Earth

[–] markr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok so I did a small bit of research and found optimistic estimates from groups promoting this of $800kg. You can’t just throw shit at earth, you have to put it down safely. In reality what makes sense is manufacturing stuff that you then don’t have to bring up to the moon, or to mars, or anywhere else off of earth. You build it on the moon instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] quicksand@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ya less gravity to fight... I'm curious what the numbers look like though, it's gotta be much more expensive than bringing stuff over on a boat from China. What advantages would mining on the moon provide?

[–] KapiteinPoffertje@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] markr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why? If it is in fact cost efficient the Chinese will be there too and will do it better at lower cost.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] coffeebiscuit@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Come on, they can just throw stuf down from the moon…

[–] FollyDolly@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Man I thought by 2023 I'd be taking my jetpack to my moon meetings not arguing over whether we should strip mine the damn place.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I'll believe it when I see it.

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Honestly I think a solar farm on the moon would be much better investing in at some point. I remember reading an article where a nation was experimenting with beaming energy down from orbit or some shit

[–] Sylver@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Brought to you by Carl’s Jr.

[–] Llcooljessie@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why do you keep saying that?

[–] Im14abeer@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

'Cause they pay me every time I do. You're so smart, why don't you know that?

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Because fuck you, he's eating. Eating an extra big-ass fries.

[–] WEAPONX@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Do you want Morlocks? Because that's how you get Morlocks.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

We must not allow capitalism to escape this planet

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What does that mean practically, how can we pursue this goal?

Hasn't this mission already failed, with SpaceX and other private space companies already doing business in orbit and reaching beyond?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Tim Curry in shambles.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The one place yet to be corrupted by capitalism:

SBACE

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HUMAN_TRASH@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I can see the war for the moon coming over the horizon

load more comments
view more: next ›