this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
774 points (96.5% liked)

Lefty Memes

4378 readers
82 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 49 points 6 months ago (15 children)

Capitalism is fundamentally, ideologically opposed to a good quality of life for virtually all human beings.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Except for the handful of sociopaths that get to live like kings while you struggle to stay alive.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

That’s just the thing. It’s bad for the sociopaths also because we’re feeding into their delusions. Their hoarding is also an illness.

Even if we argue that the sociopaths benefit, billionaires are a vanishingly small slice of humanity.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. They’re not genuinely happy. They don’t really have friends, and are also isolated from their communities.

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

They also go to great lengths to further separate themselves from the masses geographically, such as Zuckerberg building a massive compound/bunker on Kauai and Peter Thiel's Libertarian man-made islands project in International Waters

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] problematicPanther@lemmy.world 37 points 6 months ago

I'm fine with billionaires going to space. I just have a problem with them coming back to Earth.

[–] dentoid@sopuli.xyz 15 points 6 months ago (5 children)

I know the punchline is good as it is but i like to point out that it is actually easier to launch billionaries out of the solar system than into the sun

[–] Bougie_Birdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 months ago

And leave that trash in space? Litterbug!

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

What about deep down in the ocean? I heard of some recent tests...

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But then they might come back?

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Not if we superglue and then tie them to the seat. And give them no controls on the inside. And just play a loop of “nah, nah, nah, nah. Nah, nah, nah, nah. Hey, hey, hey. Goodbye.” Not even the whole song. Just that part, on infinite loop.

[–] PrimeErective@startrek.website 5 points 6 months ago

And so was born the unfortunately named Epstein drive

[–] young_broccoli@fedia.io 1 points 6 months ago

Just blow up the ship ffs

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

What's wrong with an orbit that'll decay into the sun? That'll take even less energy.

Lemmy is as bad as Reddit for these stupid pop-sci talking points.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think you are greatly overestimating the easiness of send cargo to the sun

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

With the trillions they steal from the rest of us we should be able to fund the project fairly easily.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

When your ship is going to the Sun, it has to cancel out nearly all of the orbital motion it inherited from Earth. In order to have the ship drop straight down towards the Sun on a one-way collision course, the ship would have to leave Earth’s sphere of influence at a relative velocity of 30 km/s.

But remember, Earth’s gravity will try to pull the ship along with it, so in reality you’d have to depart from Earth at a relative velocity of about 31.6 km/s (70,700 mph). That’s nearly twice as fast as the ship would have to go in order to escape from the Sun.

The parker solar probe cost was about 1.5 billions. A fully manned one way Mars mission would cost about 20 billions going by the cheaper estimate.

The same one way mission going to the sun would be 10k times more expensive.

About 2 hundred trillions USD

By 2022, total earth GDP was about 100 trillions.

Yeah it's not happening anytime soon

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Couldn't you just go for a slow, spiralling course instead of the direct route? Much less correction needed from Earth's course, just a constant deceleration relative to the orbit path.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

I mean at this point it's cheaper to focus on building the future instead of whatever the original question proposal was

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

The billionaires don't have to be intact on their flight.

[–] voldage@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ok, listen tough guy, you make that a two or even three way trip or whatever you need, do the math while the rest of us catch the rich and plunder their physical vaults full of gold coins which we will use to buy the rocket, and then we meet up again to discuss how to shove 'em up there kay

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You are greatly overestimating the amount of actual wealth rich people have.

[–] voldage@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I've read Donald Duck comics back when I was a kid so I would say that my understanding of how the rich operate is pretty much perfect representation of reality, thank you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gens@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You can use earths, moons, or any others gravity to aim the rocket.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Out of the solar system yes

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Stupid question: do asteroids hit the sun, or do they get pushed away by the sun and melt?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

If you have pretty much any lateral velocity, you'll end up in a highly elliptical orbit and miss the sun

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LHvR1fRTW8g&pp=ygUYaG93IHRvIGZhbGwgaW50byB0aGUgc3Vu

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I think people should reevaluate doing that to billionaires. I just learned that it would take more energy to fire something into the Sun than it would to shoot it out of the Solar System. We could get more done aiming in the other direction.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You don't need to hit the sun dead center to incinerate something in the sun, just get it within the orbit of mercury and it'll take care of itself.

Also what's wrong with firing it into an orbit that'll decay into the sun? You don't need to 1 shot these things.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Technically we’re all on a slowly decaying orbit into the sun 🌞

[–] lauha@lemmy.one 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure that is not true

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well it’s either that or we’re slowly falling out of orbit, no? The Sun will die and consume us before we spiral into it though, I think?

[–] lauha@lemmy.one 2 points 6 months ago

Orbits are stable until affected by some force. Earth orbit is table as long as we can forecast it but in the long run other planets might change them one way or another

[–] lauha@lemmy.one 5 points 6 months ago

I bet good ol' guillotines are much cheaper

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 months ago

Err, no wrong, bad physics.

Also, the guillotine requires no such bullshit.

[–] boogetyboo@aussie.zone 12 points 6 months ago

Missing the artist! First Dog On The Moon! https://firstdogonthemoon.com.au/

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

I say fire pit roasted, like a pig bbq.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It’s difficult, but I try to remember this and enjoy the absurdity of it all. So, thanks for the reminder.

Sounds impractical the system always ends up with a 1% that had most of the wealth

[–] starman@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

frightened that you will [...] die old

What's the problem?

[–] thefrankring@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

You can't be entirely capitalist but you can't be entirely socialist as well.

load more comments
view more: next ›