this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
32 points (82.0% liked)

Python

6356 readers
6 users here now

Welcome to the Python community on the programming.dev Lemmy instance!

πŸ“… Events

PastNovember 2023

October 2023

July 2023

August 2023

September 2023

🐍 Python project:
πŸ’“ Python Community:
✨ Python Ecosystem:
🌌 Fediverse
Communities
Projects
Feeds

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ertai@programming.dev 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

Yet another python packager............... insane that such a popular language still doesn't have this basic problem solved.

[–] CodeMonkey@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

pip is a perfectly usable package manager and is included in most python distributions now. Is it perfect? No, but it is good enough for every team I have been on.

[–] astrojuanlu@social.coop 10 points 1 month ago

@CodeMonkey @ertai No it is not perfectly usable for all people, all projects, all situations. uv definitely gets much closer to that.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

it's usable, yet it doesn't attempt to solve a a third of the problems uv, poetry, and pdm address.

it's also not hard to end up with a broken env with pip.

[–] Moc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Except that it’s slower than uv and therefore strictly worse for build processes

[–] uthredii@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Putting aside the speed uv has a bunch of features that usually require 2-4 separate tools. These tools are very popular but not very well liked. The fact these tools are so popular proves that pip is not sufficient for many use cases. Other languages have a single tool (e.g. cargo) that are very well liked.

load more comments (3 replies)