this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
332 points (92.3% liked)

World News

39104 readers
2469 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Three individuals targeted National Gallery paintings an hour after Phoebe Plummer and Anna Holland were jailed for similar attack in 2022

Climate activists have thrown tomato soup over two Sunflowers paintings by Vincent van Gogh, just an hour after two others were jailed for a similar protest action in 2022.

Three supporters of Just Stop Oil walked into the National Gallery in London, where an exhibition of Van Gogh’s collected works is on display, at 2.30pm on Friday afternoon, and threw Heinz soup over Sunflowers 1889 and Sunflowers 1888.

The latter was the same work targeted by Phoebe Plummer and Anna Holland in 2022. That pair are now among 25 supporters of Just Stop Oil in jail for climate protests.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can I request an article or at least a transcription?

[–] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

YouTube provides transcripts. It's in the discription on the website

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

YouTube provides transcripts.

Wow. I am behind the times. I'll look through it then.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also the section "jso critics" and "does it work"

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

"No art on a dead planet" is a braindead justification and does not in any way outline how vandalism of art is supposed to translate into climate activism, while the four criteria outlined for activism are valid but in no way provide a special justification for vandalism of cultural artifacts, which has a significantly greater backlash from the exact kind of educated people most likely to get involved in climate activism, and very little disruptive potential.

"I understand that we're pissing people off but there's no other way to get attention" and "Negative attention is good attention, because maybe it will cause people to become positively engaged with the cause" are not particularly compelling rebuttals in the critics section.

"JSO was central in setting the 2024 Labour agenda" is utterly deluded, while all the cited actions by their sister organizations in Europe are much more traditional instances of civil disobedience that have long-proven track records and a clear and logical progression of action-to-influence.

This really reinforces my view that JSO are terribly naive and have no real idea on how their actions will seriously lead to mass change of opinions on climate change.

[–] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

"No art on a dead planet" is a braindead justification and does not in any way outline how vandalism of art is supposed to translate into climate activism

If damaged art hurts your feelings get mad at the government killing all art on the planet and not the activists partially damaging some art.

"I understand that we're pissing people off but there's no other way to get attention" ... not particularly compelling rebuttals in the critics section

Why not? How else should they be getting attention?

"JSO was central in setting the 2024 Labour agenda" is utterly deluded,

I won't disagree

This really reinforces my view that JSO are terribly naive and have no real idea on how their actions will seriously lead to mass change of opinions on climate change.

Yeah I don't get the vibe from you that you'd change your view

Partially related but do you have any evidence that jso tactics has a "greater backlash from the exact kind of educated people most likely to get involved in climate activism" or is that kinda vibes based