this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
412 points (95.2% liked)

196

16450 readers
1843 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] germanatlas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 134 points 1 month ago (9 children)
[–] kinkles@sh.itjust.works 141 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

They have neither confirmed or denied it being a trans allegory. It depends on how you interpret the response Lilly Wachowski gave in an interview a few years ago:

Continuing on The Matrix, you confirmed a couple years ago that it was a trans allegory —

No, I didn’t. 

You didn’t? Tell me more. 

Yeah, so that came from an interview I did for Disclosure. They had a bunch of Matrix questions. And the question they asked me was about Switch, who was originally written as a trans character who was male in the real world and female in the matrix. And they took that response and attached the question that everyone now references that it’s a trans allegory. And so it was slightly out of context, but I don’t sit here and put a stink up about it, because it is a trans allegory in that it was written by two closeted trans women. And so all of the things that are in it are super-duper trans. The idea of transformation, even the whole “My name is Neo, Mr. Anderson —” that idea of claiming identity, it’s undeniable.

https://www.them.us/story/lilly-wachowski-mentoring-the-matrix-interview

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago (7 children)

So it was an unintentional trans allegory?

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 month ago

Closeted people often express their desires subconsciously. Well, frankly, most people do.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)