this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
34 points (97.2% liked)

Python

6343 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the Python community on the programming.dev Lemmy instance!

πŸ“… Events

PastNovember 2023

October 2023

July 2023

August 2023

September 2023

🐍 Python project:
πŸ’“ Python Community:
✨ Python Ecosystem:
🌌 Fediverse
Communities
Projects
Feeds

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
erlingur@programming.dev
jnovinger@programming.dev
norambna@programming.dev
34
uv under discussion on Mastodon (simonwillison.net)
submitted 2 months ago by norambna@programming.dev to c/python@programming.dev
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

via https://fedi.simonwillison.net/@simon/113102865356065670

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ericjmorey@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Why is there often no discussion or mention of Pixi along with uv in conversations about Python tooling? Is it because uv has a lot of VC money to get attention while Pixi doesn't?

[–] houseofleft@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think short answer is yes, but longer answer is also that Pixi is a drop in replacement for Conda, which is a lot less used than Pip (which uv is a replacement for).

[–] ericjmorey@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

Pixi is more than a drop in replacement for Conda. Pixi being able to replace Conda and do everything that uv does (Pixi has incorporated uv into it's tools) seems to make it a more complete toolset than uv alone.