this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
138 points (100.0% liked)

The Signal messenger and protocol.

1647 readers
1 users here now

https://signal.org/

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 141 points 2 months ago (13 children)

Tl;dr: Signal gave the court timestamps for three out of nine phone numbers that the court demanded data on. The timestamps were the dates three phone numbers last registered their accounts with Signal. That’s it. That is all the data there was to give.

This is why I use Signal. This is why I donate monthly to Signal.

[–] PatrickYaa@lemmy.one 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

Well, i'm not fluent in legalese, but isn't the search order also exclusively asking for those two datapoints and nothing more? They're not asking for message timestamps e.g. or other metadata.

[–] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Good catch. It does look like that. Maybe the court already knew that Signal doesn’t have any data to hand over beyond the registration dates?

[–] dhhyfddehhfyy4673@fedia.io 14 points 2 months ago

Maybe the court already knew that Signal doesn’t have any data to hand over beyond the registration dates?

That seems likely the case based off the series of previous warrants & subpoenas where they kept having to explain that they didn't have any of that other shit to give.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)