this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
723 points (84.8% liked)

Comics

5916 readers
6 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine 🇵🇸 . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -3 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Just like Capitalism you aren’t going to find any examples of the system in the world today

When people actually lived in communes it was cool though

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Just like Capitalism you aren’t going to find any examples of the system in the world today

About to have my brain turned into soup by asking this question:

Are you implying that there are no examples of capitalism in the world today?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

Yeah, what country rewards jobs based on hours worked rather than assets owned?

What people refer to as “late-stage capitalism” is no different than the system capitalism was supposed to replace

[–] MaeBorowski@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just because it is (and always was) a complete lie that capitalism would lead to prosperity for working people, that doesn't mean that capitalists aren't doing capitalism. Capitalism hasn't been corrupted from some ideal system into something else, this is what capitalism is and it's been known as such for over a century and a half.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Since the beginning but not because that’s what capitalism is, it’s because the mercantilist lords wanted a rebrand when peasants started killing them

If a country decided to switch to communism, that elite rebrand would still happen. Animal Farm paints this, China having more inequality than Japan or South Korea also paints this it’s what allows people to say true capitalism has never been tested and the elite can exploit that to increase inequality

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Animal Farm is garbage and Orwell was a racist, antisemitic, homophobic, backstabbing snitch: Orwell's list.

Animal Farm was Cold War agitprop, which the CIA airdropped on eastern Europe and made it into an animated film that you may have seen. The CIA funded the film adaptation of 1984 as well.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You’re even aware you don’t have an argument so you went after the author’s character which is irrelevant then started talking about the cia

As per the original point: you’re inability to understand that the rich are greedy doesn’t mean they aren’t

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Since the beginning but not because that’s what capitalism is, it’s because the mercantilist lords wanted a rebrand when peasants started killing them

That’s not what happened. It was the burghers themselves who revolted against the feudal lords. The peasants didn’t revolt against the burghers: some were uninvolved and I assume some aided the burghers against the feudal lords who owned the land they tilled. These were bourgeois revolutions.

And capitalism is not a mere “rebranding,” it is a very different socio-politico-economic system from feudalism, though yes, it is still one based on class hierarchy. The ultimate goal of communism is to eliminate hierarchies: a classless society.

China having more inequality than Japan or South Korea also paints this

It is true that China has billionaires. It is also true that China has raised 800 million people out of poverty, “the greatest such effort in history.”

If a country decided to switch to communism, that elite rebrand would still happen.

Do you see CPC members boating around the world on megayachts? The “elite” in China—if you want to call the democratically elected representatives “elite”—are not fabulously wealthy, despite the fact that, if they wanted to, they could literally print as many Yuan as they pleased and pocket it. The billionaires are capitalists, in the constrained amount of capitalism the Chinese state currently allows.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_peasant_revolts

Here’s a list of peasant revolts for you to browse through, take note of those through the 16-18th centuries

Do you see CPC members boating around the world on megayachts? The “elite” in China—if you want to call the democratically elected representatives “elite”—are not fabulously wealthy

As shown in proof above; China has bigger inequality than Japan and South Korea.

China also has the second most billionaires in the world

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

This is just getting silly now.

Here’s a list of peasant revolts for you to browse through, take note of those through the 16-18th centuries

The fact that peasant revolts happened is neither here nor there. The point is that capitalism was borne of bourgeois revolutions against feudal powers and not of peasant revolts against burghers who were a product of mercantilism.

As shown in proof above; China has bigger inequality than Japan and South Korea.

Thanks for repeating yourself I guess?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)