this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
751 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

59671 readers
2892 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

OpenAI now tries to hide that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books, including J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series::A new research paper laid out ways in which AI developers should try and avoid showing LLMs have been trained on copyrighted material.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stinkywinks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (26 children)

Because everyone learns from books, it's stupid.

[–] otherbastard@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (25 children)

An LLM is not a person, it is a product. It doesn't matter that it "learns" like a human - at the end of the day, it is a product created by a corporation that used other people's work, with the capacity to disrupt the market that those folks' work competes in.

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

And it should be able to freely use anything that's available to it. These massive corporations and entities have exploited all the free spaces to advertise and sell us their own products and are now sour.

If they had their way they are going to lock up much more of the net behind paywalls. Everybody should be with the LLMs on this.

[–] otherbastard@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are somehow conflating "massive corporation" with "independent creator," while also not recognizing that successful LLM implementations are and will be run by massive corporations, and eventually plagued with ads and paywalls.

People that make things should be allowed payment for their time and the value they provide their customer.

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People are paid. But they're greedy and expect far more compensation then they deserve. In this case they should not be compensated for having an LLM ingest their work work if that work was legally owned or obtained

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)