this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
113 points (95.2% liked)

World News

32079 readers
772 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] its_prolly_fine@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

WTF?! They burn wood pellets? Seriously? How is that even vaguely a renewable resource?

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Tree grows. There for, can make more. There for, renewables. Big brain.

[–] its_prolly_fine@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If grown as a crop I can see that. But taking from forests changes the forest permanently. I see your point, I guess I'm taking issue with what I associate with a renewable resource when talking about energy. That is is "green" and not bad for the environment.

Saying trees are carbon capures so its carbon neutral just seems crazy to me. Burning wood emits more carbon dioxide than coal for every unit of electricity produced. The older the tree the more carbon it can store, which is in its wood. Mature as in 35-75 years. Cutting down mature trees out of forests and planting new ones isn't carbon neutral. But I can see an argument for planting tree plots in already cleared land to get a system set up for rotations.

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Sarcasm doesn't come over well on the internet. You're absolutely right that burning wood for power is stupid really the only thing we should be using for steam turbines is nuclear.

load more comments (2 replies)