this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)
Hacker News
2169 readers
31 users here now
A mirror of Hacker News' best submissions.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
And they're replacing it with a new device that does the same thing for twice as much money.
Not sure if you were being facetious or not, but that is in fact what they're doing
It's actually more than 2x the price at $99
:-(
I was being serious. The 4k Chromecast is $49.99, so I guess the new one is a penny more than 2x, but close enough. The differences are not worth that upgrade though:
That's it.
If you use a chromecast to just cast from your phone this upgrade isn't worth a damn. If you use a settop box to like play android games or something then an Nvidia Shield is a better option for you. For everyone else this is just an excuse to raise prices for new customers that aren't aware of existing offerings.
It doesn't matter if it's "faster" 4k 60 is going to play at the same speed.
Oh I wasn't aware they went up to $49.99, I remembered them being $30-40, maybe it was a sale or older model.
Strange about the Atmos though, I could swear my 4k Chromecast does support Dolby Atmos.
Also for a streaming box, what is the point of increasing the storage?
This "upgrade" just seems so useless.
Iirc, the Google TV has installable apps to include games. I have a Chromecast ultra that is streaming only, no remote, 4k, and Ethernet. In my opinion it's where they peaked. But subsequent versions had the built in interface for remote control and apps.
The 1080p Chromecast is about $30.