this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
235 points (98.4% liked)

Ukraine

8310 readers
773 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam
  6. No content against Finnish law

Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aramis87@fedia.io 25 points 3 months ago (18 children)

I'm delighted we're sending these over to Ukraine (though it should have been done a long time ago).

Question: the F-16s are planes. Is there some reason we're loading them onto other planes for transport instead of flying them over?

[–] BatrickPateman@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Ease of transfer (one pilot vs multiple for a looooong flight, probably no refuel on the Antonow, and if so it eats less specialised stuff than the F-16s) and maybe even fuel efficiency, I would guess.

Also, one cargo plane raises less eye brows than a flock of fighters.

[–] ItWasTheDNS@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

AN-124’s are extremely inefficient - it’s probably stopping 2-3 times on route, but still easier to arrange than flying each plane.

[–] Alienmonkey@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Think they'd go west over the pacific or back across the US?

[–] ItWasTheDNS@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Back across the US - Portland Maine is a popular tech stop for the AN124’s and then probably someplace in the UK

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)