this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
29 points (89.2% liked)

Furry Technologists

1308 readers
1 users here now

Science, Technology, and pawbs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] l_b_i@yiffit.net 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I understand your point of view, but whether you like it or not, your title will be viewed as the framing. "What Does It Mean To Be A Signal Competitor?" At a surface reading, it seems to me what that means to you is very different from what that means to others.

I assume you probably wrote it along the lines of "What does it mean for an E2E encrypted protocol to compete with Signal on a technical level"

Others read it as "what does it mean to compete with the signal app" and there is no additional depth to security.

[–] Soatok@pawb.social -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Anyone incapable of reading past the title is not worth listening to

[–] awooo@pawb.social 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think what they mean is that someone unfamiliar with your line of work might even read the entire post and come away with it with the view of "Okay, and?" since the title told them this was going to be about "What Does It Mean To Be A Signal Competitor?"

The problem there is that what Signal is is different to different people, someone might for example use it like any other chat application, in which case even something like Telegram (ew) or Discord could be an alternative to them.

Again, if someone is familiar with your blog, they'll know what you mean, but the blog post can be viewed by someone in isolation, in which case it won't be so clear, especially since it's also in relation to moving off of Telegram, which is not an E2EE platform at all by default

[–] Soatok@pawb.social -1 points 3 months ago

If they actually read the whole thing, including the addendum, there should no longer be any confusion.

As a rule, I never change titles after pressing Publish.