this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
80 points (95.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9612 readers
552 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/17525307

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Looking at the second photo in the article it looks like it bent the bollards over, which I would guess mightve launched the car into the air...

I think the bigger systemic problem would be the 8 lane roads in the area which enabled enough space for the car to get up enough speed to do that sort of damage to a bollard: https://maps.app.goo.gl/aHDmVJMPt3LKvAeL9?g_st=ac

Another systematic problem is the enbiggening of vehicles in the name of occupants saftey(larger pillars for better rollover protection, and extra passenger cabin rigidity, which also harms visibility for the driver due to wider pillars)

[–] drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

it looks like it bent the bollards over,

So they weren't bollards, they were decoration.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Ah yeah true, they were railings not bollards, but they look like they were solid steel, so I don't think it's fair to just call them "decoration".

[–] chocoladisco@feddit.de 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As someone working in the field of bollards: If they arent rated to stop a hostile vehicle, they are just decoration.