this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
706 points (95.1% liked)

People Twitter

5283 readers
653 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 116 points 4 months ago (27 children)

Trick is to not give a fuck about how fast other people are going, and cruise at 65mph (105km/h) at a safe distance behind a combination tractor trailer.

You can drive without much stress, because impatient drivers don't like to be in that spot behind a truck so you are less likely to be cut off. You'll have plenty of time to react to anything in front, and also be safe in knowing that if there is a pileup ahead, a clear path will be smashed through for you.

[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 32 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Fuel efficiency will even be better in the slip stream.

[–] PrimeErective@startrek.website 75 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, to get the benefit of the slip steam, you gotta be pretty close to the back of the truck. If you have space for good reaction time, you're probably too far back

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is correct, especially at lower speeds. Greater fuel efficiency would come from lower wind and drivetrain resistance and use of a more efficient range of the motor’s powerband.

Most vehicles are geared for optimal speed to fuel consumption around 55-65 mph (90-100 kph) not 70+ mph (110+ kph). So just going a bit under the speed limit can have a significant impact on fuel consumption.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Also, truckers drive efficiently, so just following what they do will save gas.

But yeah, I don't go over 65mph and I end up with 7-10mpg over my highway rating.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 4 months ago

This has been tested. You still get a reasonable benefit 3 seconds behind; you get practically nothing 6 seconds behind

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)