this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
62 points (95.6% liked)

Linux

5191 readers
25 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
62
Why openSUSE? (reddthat.com)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Telorand@reddthat.com to c/linux@programming.dev
 

First, let me be clear up front that I'm not promoting the idea that there should be one "universal" Linux distro. With all the various distros out there for consumers, there's lots of discussion about Arch, Debian, and Fedora (and their various descendant projects), but I rarely see much talk about openSUSE.

Why might somebody choose that one over the others? What features or vision distinguishes it from the others?

Edit: I love all the answers! Great stuff. Thanks to everyone!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Tumbleweed is rock solid. I took out an old Intel based Macbook that has not been updated in two years (I stopped traveling for work and no longer needed a laptop so the software got outdated). OpenSuse Tumbleweed updated flawlessly. It switched to the newest gcc, switched over to pipewire, etc. without a single issue. I did not read the latest news as I used to do on Arch.

Also, OpenSuse is a family of distros. Choose what works for you. Tumbleweed is the main product and the base of all Suse offerings (and I recommend it).

  • Tumbleweed rolls similarly to Arch but has more QA testing
  • Slowroll is just snapshots of Tumbleweed that are updated less frequently. May replace Leap.
  • Leap does traditional releases similar to other OSes such as Mac, Windows, and Ubuntu
  • MicroOS (and its flavors) update the same way Android does; as a full image. You could pick a MicroOS flavor such as Aeon (Gnome) or Kalpa (KDE) and stick to Flatpaks which as a strategy works great on the Steamdeck but I have yet to try it on desktop.

As someone who has tried several Linux distributions what was important to me was how stable updates were. On that old Macbook, that I used for ten years; I mostly used Chakra, Arch, and Tumbleweed. That Tumbleweed install was at least six years old.

I did have one issue, but it was a kernel introduced bug. Long since fixed. Someone messed up Apple EFI boot; so I had to load the EFI menu when booting and then select my internal SSD to start the OS.

[–] fr0g@feddit.de 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

MicroOS (and its flavors) update the same way Android does; as a full image

They don't. They update with regular packages. The updates are atomic though and are only applied at next boot, so there's less of a risk of weird breakages.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Thank you for the correction. I totally did not notice that.