this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
225 points (96.3% liked)

Science Memes

11086 readers
2512 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
225
Deadication (mander.xyz)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Christ, well... thanks for your work.

What does not being adaptive mean in this case?

[–] trolske@feddit.de 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Adaptive here means whether necrophilia occurs in order to still produce offspring, i.e. it's 'conscious' (I use that term veeeery loosely here) or if it occurs just because the animals don't recognize that the partner is dead.
I remember a paper about a frog species (not sure if it was the one from the meme) where the males participated in necrophilia, but they basically tried to squeeze eggs out of anything they grabbed. Living female, dead female, stone, sponge. All the same.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Would it be accurate to say that an adaptive trait is one selected by some evolutionary pressure, while a non-adaptive trait is just coincidence?

How could you tell if this trait was just very broad in it's application, say just the instinct to squeeze things, verses something completely coincidental?

[–] trolske@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah, that's exactly right.
As for the second part, I'm not sure how to answer. Squeezing the partner is without a doubt adaptive, but squeezing anything that is roughly the same shape is a byproduct with no (strong) evolutionary pressure. Now, the question is whether functional necrophilia is adaptive or just a byproduct is very difficult to answer, but I lean towards byproduct.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)