this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
117 points (87.3% liked)

Gaming

19728 readers
577 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CharlesReed@kbin.social 22 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Every time I think we've moved passed this as an argument, it pops back up. They'll blame anything but those they should be holding accountable.

[–] MarjorineFailureGroan@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It seems like they're saying that it markets guns, not the typical argument that it makes kids violent. This argument seems less crazy to me.

[–] CharlesReed@kbin.social 5 points 3 months ago

It's still not a convincing one though. If it wasn't this weapon used, it would have been another, regardless of where the perp first saw it. I'm not a fan of Activision, but this isn't on them.

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

So I'm not a fan of guns but, "marketing guns" is not per se illegal nor unique to video games. Yet the lawsuit separates out video games specifically. So I am not sure I agree that it's less crazy at the end of the day.