They're legally capped at 25 km/h, even if the technology exists to make them faster than that. It's a big speed boost up hill, but makes no difference down hill and it's roughly equal (or even a negative for strong cyclists) on the flat.
I don't think speed is really the right thing to look at when talking about the advantage of ebikes. Instead, it's the ability to travel with less physical effort, especially when going on hilly routes or carrying larger loads.
(And as a minor side note, I really wish we used the 20 mph speed cap used in places that still use mediaeval measurements. 32 km/h is still a very safe speed, but would be noticeably faster.)
Yes, as a motorcyclist I’m always aghast at the speed cyclists can attain in relation to the protective clothing they don’t wear. I can understand why it’s not practical to wear abrasion-resistant clothing and a full-face helmet, but still.
They're legally capped at 25 km/h, even if the technology exists to make them faster than that. It's a big speed boost up hill, but makes no difference down hill and it's roughly equal (or even a negative for strong cyclists) on the flat.
I don't think speed is really the right thing to look at when talking about the advantage of ebikes. Instead, it's the ability to travel with less physical effort, especially when going on hilly routes or carrying larger loads.
(And as a minor side note, I really wish we used the 20 mph speed cap used in places that still use mediaeval measurements. 32 km/h is still a very safe speed, but would be noticeably faster.)
Imagine we had the infrastructure to let people get around at 45km/h on a cargo bike
Personally I think 45 km/h is an excessive and potentially unsafe speed.
Yes, as a motorcyclist I’m always aghast at the speed cyclists can attain in relation to the protective clothing they don’t wear. I can understand why it’s not practical to wear abrasion-resistant clothing and a full-face helmet, but still.