hmm, I imagine the then 2 prevalent systems of neoliberal capitalism and soviet-style "communism" to be a pretty terrible combination actually. Although I believe I get what he was trying to say about individual rights within an economy of the commons(or at least thats how I interpret it).

[–] Akagigahara@lemmy.akagigahara.site 4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I can't follow, would you elaborate? Sounds like an interesting debate :)

[–] toothbrush@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The funny combination would be to combine the single party authoritarian structure with a completly unregulated economy for maximum carnage :P

As far as I underatand the quote, hes talking about needing a socialist system where the rights of individuals are respected and protected, but factories, housing etc is owned and and managed by the commons.

[–] Akagigahara@lemmy.akagigahara.site 8 points 1 year ago

That kinda sounds like the goal of socialism to me, with a state managing the societal functions but the workers owning the means of production but still in a capitalist environment

[–] scribs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

funny, "we all lift together" started playing in my head.

[–] Killing_Spark@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I love stumbling about references to this game

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Your first paragraph pretty much describes the PRC.

load more comments (4 replies)